amanda Speed
Nitro Member
That is what I thought, the HDs ETs are quicker but the speed is down. Whats up with that?
Duh, it's because they roll out of the throttle near the finish line!!!
That is what I thought, the HDs ETs are quicker but the speed is down. Whats up with that?
low end HP versus high end HP.
Or maybe that throttle grip rapidly moving in a clockwise position at 1200'?![]()
You guys are hilarious...
You guys are hilarious...
You guys are hilarious...
You guys are hilarious...
Let's see you give up 59 CI and see how quick your sand-bagging Hardley runs then.You guys are hilarious...
There is really no comparison between the H-D's/Riceburner parity and Glidden dominating Pro Stock with a Ford (post 500ci implementation) as all engines were pushrod V8s w/carbs
In this instance we have two completely different engine configurations and capacities.
Registered member said:A min weight and a max cu.in. PERIOD.
Well said. Don't drag Glidden into this. Anyone else who wanted to run a Ford at that time could have. They just knew they would not be able to make the same power he made because he was the man.
Duh, it's because they roll out of the throttle near the finish line!!!
What would solve the problem is to sell the Harley's, just like Suzuki and Buell does then other teams would push the other bikes for that make... You can buy a complete suzuki for around 60k all new, best of that make... You can buy a buell for around 110k all new, best of that make... So sell the Harley's for around what the buell sell's for and I will take one a push V&H to show there hands... Heck I will even take the old motors.... Matt Smith