Kalitta Loses Mac Tools (1 Viewer)

StarLink
High Speed Internet
Available AnyWhere On Earth
Now $349


Dammit, Karl! We're having a perfectly good pi$$ing match and you have to stroll in here and ruin it with a bunch of crap that makes sense!

Geez, already.......................;)

Sean D
 
Dammit, Karl! We're having a perfectly good pi$$ing match and you have to stroll in here and ruin it with a bunch of crap that makes sense!

Geez, already.......................;)

Sean D

TY... TYVM....

3/4th of what was running through the mind did not make it to the fingers on the keyboard...

Saddest thing in the the world is those that are on their best behavior while dating, then let their real selves out AFTER the wedding...
or those that believe "I CAN Change Them after we say I DO"

get my drift?

d'kid
 
When was the last time NHRA lost a major sponsor? It just doesnt seem right that these teams are getting left high and dry but NHRA keeps the same sponsor on for events. Doesn't that go against the rules? If a team cant get money from a energy dring because of "rules" then how can NHRA bypass rules to keep sponsor?

It makes more sense in this economic condition for NHRA to say "Hey guys, times are tough so if you can get money from anyone, energy drink ect get it."
 
Is it Full Throttle that's mandating that no other energy drinks can sponsor NHRA cars, or is it the NHRA that's mandating that?
 
If it is Full Throttle why would NHRA agree knowing it would effect possible future car sponsors for racers?

If it was NHRA why would you mandate that sponsorship exclusivity?

Either way the NHRA is getting paid, and the racers lose out.

Am I wrong?
 
If it is Full Throttle why would NHRA agree knowing it would effect possible future car sponsors for racers?

If it was NHRA why would you mandate that sponsorship exclusivity?

Either way the NHRA is getting paid, and the racers lose out.

Am I wrong?

That's what I've been saying all along.

NHRA has painted themselves, and more importantly their racers, into a corner trying to emulate NASCAR with many of their policies. I've also heard a number of folks talk about how NASCAR is also taking major hits these days, but as the motorsports giant that has carried the level of popularity they have for the better part of 20 years, there's really only one way to go, and that's down.

Even in the good days, drag racing is/was second only to NASCAR in popularity/fanfare, but it was a distant second. I believe that the NHRA's failure to recognize/understand this little detail, i.e. that just because you're in second place doesn't necessarily mean you're close to the lead dog, has resulted in some of these poor decisions that are now going to cost drag racing dearly now that times are turbulent. You need to look no further than the hypocrisy noted in the post a couple before mine regarding sponsorship policy to understand who the sanctioning body is truly looking out for. I can't help but wonder how many sponsors would be, or still are ready to play if it weren't for the exclusives, much less why the sponsors that have left the NHRA but remain in NASCAR if the NHRA is number 1 in customer satisfaction. :rolleyes:

The lifting of exclusives needs to happen, and happen now. It's keeping money from coming into the sport, creating monopoly like circumstances that result in higher than necessary product cost and compromising the incentive to provide the best quality product by removing the competition. The answer? Very simple. You give the folks making these decisions a little thing called a plexotamy. By removing a small section of the abdomen and replacing it with a piece of plexiglass (spelling?), it allows one to still see what's going on in spite of their head being in their.........................

Sean D
 
Last edited:
This with an innaugural event which always has great attendance.
I covered this above, but here it is again - Assuming that they didn't account for an extra race, if you back out 90,000 estimated fans from Charlotte, you get a 4-6% drop in attendance over a record previous year. Depending on who you believe, Nascar was down anywhere from 20-25%.

The 90k number came straight out of Bruton Smith's mouth and I used an average of 75k-80k for a 3 day race to come up with the percentages.

Even though most apparently don't like it. Have you seen the polls?
I have seen the polls. The ones on hard core fan sites. Without a doubt it's overwhelmingly hated in those polls. However, have you seen PJ's petition? Just a fraction of registered 'Maters have signed it over the course of two years, much less a significant number of NHRA members, and even smaller number of NHRA fans. Keep in mind that the petition got some press from some pretty big sites when he put it up. I think the more accurate statement would be hardcore fans don't like the countdown, the rest either like it or don't care. In any case, not enough people hate it enough for NHRA to make any changes.

And maybe they shouldn't have mentioned Catepillar.
This was before Cat pulled out, but I agree.

Registered member said:
The number one rule in sales, whether introducing a new product or competing for market share is ADVERTISE, ADVERTISE, ADVERTISE! right now the smart companies that will survive this and flourish are the ones that subscribe to that philosophy.
I couldn't agree more. I preach this to my clients every chance I get.

And lastly, well said Karl.
 
Ways To Support Nitromater

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top