johnny
Nitro Member
What's interesting to me is, I thought Team Army was at the very least a suspect in the initial complaint rumor. Then Don and Matt hang out and, it appears, not to be the case. Second, in spite of the fact that I thought/think the V-Twins should've been considered a single entity, and VHR was innocent, because of their conspicuous exclusion with regards to the revision, NHRA put VHR behind the suspicion 8-ball. Now it appears the current target is Army's alleged development of the next generation Suzuki and, likely, Muzzy's Kawasaki. My question, if a new Suzuki or Kawasaki appears and runs mid 6.80, why would anyone expect anything less than a rules revision? That's how it's always been.
Having said that, why a memo/mandate? Maybe, at this point, NHRA should legislate in silence, in a fair and prudent manner.
Suzuki has got a new combination and it could have an advantage, isn't that what this sport is all about? What's the problem, are the Harley guys worried about Suzuki beating them? There could be penalties for using the Suzuki combination if they go too quick? This sounds like a Restriction of Trade case for the courts. If the powers don't want Suzuki kicking ass, than just make Suzukis illegal and reqiure that if you run Pro Stock Bike, you must run a Harley! Sounds fair to me?
What will they come up with next, not allowing nice looking petite women to compete?
Dave
AS for Petite Woman riders, was there any other rider under 150 lbs. before Angelle? You can't compete in PSB unless your a Horse jockey anymore...![]()
Super Street
Super Gas
Super Comp
Super PSM