Jenn
Nitro Member
To watch slower cars. Yep, that makes sense!![]()
So it was never about the close racing, spectacular speeds, and record E.T.s.
It's all about the extra 320 feet!
To watch slower cars. Yep, that makes sense!![]()
I'm pretty sure they won't be offering up one of their drivers as a sacrificial offering to your wallet.
Driver loses his life in a racing accident, association takes preventative action, fans complain. Boo hoo. Your grief is NOTHING compared to the Kalittas and Oberhoffers grief. Are you trying to minimize that? Poor baby you are, you lost a few hundred bucks, Scott Kalitta lost his LIFE.
To watch slower cars. Yep, that makes sense!![]()
And I will say once again that I would have had no problem whatsoever if the NHRA would have taken measures to slow these cars down - in fact I would have applauded the action. But you act as though this action taken by the NHRA and PRO was the only alternative, which is simply not the case. Nobody in their right mind wants to see any further injuries or worse on a drag strip - and especially ones that can be prevented. And to imply otherwise, as you have just done, reveals more about you than it does about me. So please feel free to stick it were the sun don't shine.
Joe, If I remember right Head is all for 1000 feet. Lets give it a try!
To watch slower cars. Yep, that makes sense!![]()
So should they have postponed Denver until they could have found an good "fan approved" method? If it takes more time than that? Cancel the next couple races too?
So should they have postponed Denver until they could have found an good "fan approved" method? If it takes more time than that? Cancel the next couple races too?
If you think this action was the only alternative, or that there are no ways to slow these cars down, then let me suggest that you start by read the "Slowing Them Down" thread started by Alan Reinhart. It's not about a "fan approved" method; it's about addressing a serious safety concern even while preserving the integrity and history of the sport. I am concerned that the new 1000 foot rule does little to address the former even as I am convinced that it does serious damage to the latter.
Thanks for that response Rich. I really do appreciate it. I agree with your perspective concerning both paved and dirt track oval and road course racing.I am glad you raised the issue because you make a very valid argument. In fact I think you hit upon one of the major differences between circle track racing and drag racing. In NASCAR, for example, fans prefer variety of tracks and decry the so-called "cookie cutter" tracks that are near carbon copies of other tracks. In NASCAR a championship racer has to be good on everything from short tracks to intermediate tracks to super speedways to road courses. Variety is the name of the game. Likewise, in sprint car racing no two dirt tracks are exactly the same. Even at the same track the condition of the track itself can change from one day to the next - and sometimes even in the same night. The ability to adapt to various tracks and track conditions are a major part of what dirt racing is all about. Drag racing of course also requires adaptation to changing track conditions. But unlike NASCAR or sprint car racing, the track has always been the same length. In that sense drag racing is more like football where the field is always the same size even if the conditions on the field may vary depending on weather, type of turf, etc. Sprint car racing is more akin to baseball where the dimensions of the field very from stadium to stadium. The problem is that drag racing has been 1/4 mile since the very beginning of the sport. One cannot simply alter the length of a race without also effecting all the stats and data that has accumulated over the entire history of the sport. Because of that what we will be seeing starting with Denver will be fundamentally different than what we have seen in drag racing for more than 50 years.
I'll say it for the second time. Due to the rev limiters, they already were throwing everything they had to get to the point where the rev limiters kicked in. Boomers at the 1/8th mile? Ask Herbert about boomers at the starting line.How long before the crewchiefs learn just how much more they can throw at these motors in 3.9 secs they couldn't in 4.5? More mag, static compression, you can bet your ass that AJ and Coil will do that! What happens when we start seeing more boomers at 1/8 mile we used to see at 1000'? Will Jim Head talk about the carnage suffered past 1/8 mile and how dangerous 1000 racing is? This is only the beginning, I see 1/8 mile becoming the standard in 5 years!![]()
Someone who gets it. Thanks Jenn!So it was never about the close racing, spectacular speeds, and record E.T.s.
It's all about the extra 320 feet!
So it was never about the close racing, spectacular speeds, and record E.T.s.
It's all about the extra 320 feet!
If you think this action was the only alternative, or that there are no ways to slow these cars down, then let me suggest that you start by read the "Slowing Them Down" thread started by Alan Reinhart. It's not about a "fan approved" method; it's about addressing a serious safety concern even while preserving the integrity and history of the sport. I am concerned that the new 1000 foot rule does little to address the former even as I am convinced that it does serious damage to the latter.
And Arena Football has punting, blocking, tackles, and touchdowns just like the NFL. They both call themselves football so means they're both the same, right?