1000ft drag racing in Denver (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter JRX
- Start date
Nitrohaulic
Nitro Member
Like I told Rex on the phone the other night, you would have been laughed out of the room if you'd have suggested this 20 years ago. I used to have a hard enough time explaining to people that we bracket raced on the 1/8 mile.
Twenty years ago, right after drag racings 70s heyday, people expected to hear you say quarter mile drag racing. Now you have a greater majority of the population who have never been to a drag race. If you explain to them that it's done in 1,000 ft, they're not going to question it or act like there's something wrong with it.
If a nitro car doesn't do it for you in 1,000 ft as a new spectator, it's not going to do it for you in 1,320 ft. I'll bet most of the people who criticize it would need a change of underwear on a good 60 ft pass, much less 1,000.
Twenty years ago, right after drag racings 70s heyday, people expected to hear you say quarter mile drag racing. Now you have a greater majority of the population who have never been to a drag race. If you explain to them that it's done in 1,000 ft, they're not going to question it or act like there's something wrong with it.
If a nitro car doesn't do it for you in 1,000 ft as a new spectator, it's not going to do it for you in 1,320 ft. I'll bet most of the people who criticize it would need a change of underwear on a good 60 ft pass, much less 1,000.
Rexfiles
Nitro Member
Like I told Rex on the phone the other night, you would have been laughed out of the room if you'd have suggested this 20 years ago. I used to have a hard enough time explaining to people that we bracket raced on the 1/8 mile.
Twenty years ago, right after drag racings 70s heyday, people expected to hear you say quarter mile drag racing. Now you have a greater majority of the population who have never been to a drag race. If you explain to them that it's done in 1,000 ft, they're not going to question it or act like there's something wrong with it.
If a nitro car doesn't do it for you in 1,000 ft as a new spectator, it's not going to do it for you in 1,320 ft. I'll bet most of the people who criticize it would need a change of underwear on a good 60 ft pass.
I'd say half that distance
REX
d'kid
Nitro Member
floppers, 4-teens to 4.30's... maybe a 4.1 flat in the hero sessions
T/F about a tenth quick...
maybe a 3.99 before the end of the season, by Prock/Robert and AJ/Shoe
betcha we're still seeing right at 3 bucks at a thou
finish line closer to the butts in the seats...
I have no problem with this.
d'kid
T/F about a tenth quick...
maybe a 3.99 before the end of the season, by Prock/Robert and AJ/Shoe
betcha we're still seeing right at 3 bucks at a thou
finish line closer to the butts in the seats...
I have no problem with this.
d'kid
Rexfiles
Nitro Member
Rexfiles
Nitro Member
Nitrohaulic
Nitro Member
One interesting aspect will be a new set of milestones. A little voice tells me it's as contrived as the Countdown (what we used to "debate" about here before nitro prices, what we used to "debate" about here before shutdown areas) but, it'll still be interesting.
none
Nitro Member
No doubt it`s going to be strange seeing the fuel cars only run to 1,000 ft but if the owners and drivers are for it, then we need to support them...we don`t have to like it, but until NHRA finds what they`re looking for, then we should support the change. I hope they go back to 1,320 eventually, but it`ll be kinda cool seeing 4.1s come up on the board.
Last edited:
From limited details , yes , because he was going 300mph at 1000 ft, and would have prob. been going at close to same speed at rack end. The 320ft
would have been covered in less than 1 second. 300mph is 440 ft per sec.
Chili
Nitro Member
Your absolutely right. Teams will begin running them harder to 1000' since they don't have to keep them in one piece for 1320'. A 1000' foot track may have saved Blaine and Darrell and possibly Scott, depending on what point his engine exploded. I personally don't like the change but if all the racers are for it, it is probably best for the sport.
rollingthunder
Nitro Member
"this will mean the crew chiefs will only make the wick shorter, more fuel, more blower , more everything because they wont be hitting the rev-limiter. and god forbid there is an accident, then what? 660ft racing?"
I agree with this. Alan Johnson and the other tuners will make it run stronger yet. You can never go backwards. The human spirit always wants to push it a little further.
I agree with this. Alan Johnson and the other tuners will make it run stronger yet. You can never go backwards. The human spirit always wants to push it a little further.
MW
Nitro Member
Yeah, the duckets have already been spent for Sonoma and Indy, but after that our attention will be on IHRA, IHBA, and nostalgia. It's a terrible tragedy what happened to Blaine, Darrell, Eric, and Scott, but the panic mode (90% then 85% then chassis changes etc.....) have done more harm than good. Look at the car counts. How many NHRA legal fuel cars are there?? 300 mph racing is dangerous, and things happen (and will continue to happen). There has been top end explosions since the inception of nitro, but 99% of the time the racer walks away. While the search for the safest race car should never end, I just can't agree with pushing the panic button after every tragedy.
