ZWeinstein
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2019
- Messages
- 590
- Age
- 33
So with everything that happened this past week it obviously has re-ignited the topic of team orders and even though its been discussed in other threads I feel like there could be a deeper discussion about it than what could/is happening in the several different threads so I am generally curious as to what others think and if you "support" it how would you prefer seeing it done.
My personal opinion is that it honestly does not bother me as much as it did in years past and one reason is I believe every single team that has run a two or more car team in history has employed team orders at some point but the main reason and I forgot where I read it but someone brought the fact about why a team owner would do it and it boils down to the prestige and most importantly the money that goes with winning the championship. Not only season end money but the exposure for your sponsor in winning a world championship and the added revenue from the increased exposure/souvinier sales could mean a seven figure boost for a team. Can you blame a team for wanting that, from a business perspective I can not. To a casual fan in the stands or on TV in six months when they attend the next race or watch on TV and see the #1 on the car the casual fan wont think about the dive, he or she will just remember them being the defending champion.
Now if you are flat out against team orders than this next part will pretty much be irrelevant.
How would you prefer a team dive against one another? I will try and use historical events to explain the different methods. Mind you in a perfect world I would rather see two teams race flat out and the team who needs the win to win by .001 seconds but unfortunately its not a perfect world.
Would you want to see a team do what Troy did this past weekend in Vegas or like Larry Minor tried to do against Gary Beck in the 80s and cut a good light and make a race of it for 1000' and then shut off? Personally this is the method I would rather see as this would give the casual fan in the stands or watching on TV the resemblance of a heads up race.
Would you rather see like what happened with Jeff Arend and the blue CSK team did years ago in Maple Grove or what Mike Edwards did at the finals in (95?) against his engine builder Steve Schmidt and basically sit on the tree while his teammate runs and then take off after a second or so?
(Mainly for pro stock) Would you rather see what KJ did against his dad several times and run the #2 engine and be at a heavy performance disadvantage and essentially little to no shot at beating a teammate?
(Mainly fuel teams) Would you rather see like what happened with Force at Indy or Tommy Johnson at the Finals in '14 and watch the teammate cut a poor reaction time and then either purposefully drive the car out of the groove or the tuner purposefully smoke the tires?
Would you rather see a team claim a broken car/engine like Lucille Lee in the 80's?
Would you rather a team just flat out leave the car in the trailer like Angelle did in Topeka against John Meyers or Scott Kalitta against Doug in 99 at Brainerd?
I am generally curious to if you agree/accept team orders how you would prefer them to play out. Most of this is just a guy rambling while puffing on a cigar but I thought about it a little bit on the drive home from Vegas to Phoenix.
My personal opinion is that it honestly does not bother me as much as it did in years past and one reason is I believe every single team that has run a two or more car team in history has employed team orders at some point but the main reason and I forgot where I read it but someone brought the fact about why a team owner would do it and it boils down to the prestige and most importantly the money that goes with winning the championship. Not only season end money but the exposure for your sponsor in winning a world championship and the added revenue from the increased exposure/souvinier sales could mean a seven figure boost for a team. Can you blame a team for wanting that, from a business perspective I can not. To a casual fan in the stands or on TV in six months when they attend the next race or watch on TV and see the #1 on the car the casual fan wont think about the dive, he or she will just remember them being the defending champion.
Now if you are flat out against team orders than this next part will pretty much be irrelevant.
How would you prefer a team dive against one another? I will try and use historical events to explain the different methods. Mind you in a perfect world I would rather see two teams race flat out and the team who needs the win to win by .001 seconds but unfortunately its not a perfect world.
Would you want to see a team do what Troy did this past weekend in Vegas or like Larry Minor tried to do against Gary Beck in the 80s and cut a good light and make a race of it for 1000' and then shut off? Personally this is the method I would rather see as this would give the casual fan in the stands or watching on TV the resemblance of a heads up race.
Would you rather see like what happened with Jeff Arend and the blue CSK team did years ago in Maple Grove or what Mike Edwards did at the finals in (95?) against his engine builder Steve Schmidt and basically sit on the tree while his teammate runs and then take off after a second or so?
(Mainly for pro stock) Would you rather see what KJ did against his dad several times and run the #2 engine and be at a heavy performance disadvantage and essentially little to no shot at beating a teammate?
(Mainly fuel teams) Would you rather see like what happened with Force at Indy or Tommy Johnson at the Finals in '14 and watch the teammate cut a poor reaction time and then either purposefully drive the car out of the groove or the tuner purposefully smoke the tires?
Would you rather see a team claim a broken car/engine like Lucille Lee in the 80's?
Would you rather a team just flat out leave the car in the trailer like Angelle did in Topeka against John Meyers or Scott Kalitta against Doug in 99 at Brainerd?
I am generally curious to if you agree/accept team orders how you would prefer them to play out. Most of this is just a guy rambling while puffing on a cigar but I thought about it a little bit on the drive home from Vegas to Phoenix.