john
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 665
- Age
- 73
- Location
- Connecticut
Joe, I can imagine there is a lot of things they have to work out before enacting a new/old rule. One is getting the suits to agree with him.
Hi Larry,With six races in a row, teams don't have time to test a new combination and throwing in a new fuel combination just in time for the countdown would make it a real "rock, scissors, paper" game.
I don't think we'll ever see 98% again (the other 2% was just a stabilizer I believe) because if they did allow it, racers all over would be "pulling a Doug Herbert." (Sorry about that, Doug)
Unbelieveable! His major crucade in saving these guys $$$ last season was the move to 90%. And now it's '08??? What a Bureaucratic mess NHRA has become!
Joe,
Dan Olson has had extensive discussions with most of the front line crew chiefs on the switch back to 90%. Although the change to 85% was implemented "overnight" that was a knee jerk reaction to the situation at the time. In the ensuing period the teams have changed a lot of components to compensate for the lesser percentage and going back to more latent heat as in 90% will require several component changes. With the current shortage of hard parts and the lead time for the teams to restock their inventory waiting until 08 sounds like a good plan.
I was talking to one of the leading F/C crew cheifs last night and he said that the 85% rule is costing all of the teams a huge amount of money as component life (crank, rods and pistons) is dismal at this time.
Roo
About time! Those things sound so damn neutered it's pathetic and the poor engine parts are being beaten to death. Hearing the A/fuelers again this weekend makes me realize how good a nitro motor can sound.