What do we have now: 16 / 8 / 4 / 2 = 4rds.
With 4-wide : 32 / 16 / 8 / 4 = 4drs.
The fan gets twice the car count, on Sun. and the event takes the same time as now. 4 rds.
More cars on Sun. = more sponsors happy
Of course this would be if only the winner of each rd moves on. This two winner format stinks.
What do we have now: 16 / 8 / 4 / 2 = 4rds.
With 4-wide : 32 / 16 / 8 / 4 = 4drs.
The fan gets twice the car count, on Sun. and the event takes the same time as now. 4 rds.
More cars on Sun. = more sponsors happy
Of course this would be if only the winner of each rd moves on. This two winner format stinks.
Sherwood bribed me to use his name……..
Your numbers for 4 wide 32 car fields represent winner and runner-up moving on in first 3 rounds...For single winner each set it would be as follows:
32/8/2
A few thoughts, if I may.
Paul Sapienza may be right in suggesting there are cars out there, but let’s ask this question: Do you want to see some of those leakers oiling the track and slowing up YOUR show?
Jon Asher
Senior Editor
CompetitionPlus.com
Hey Joe, at least you can say that a first class writer put Tom Compton, Bruton Smith and Joe Sherwood in the same sentence...
Nice writing as always Jon.
Who the f**k is Joe Sherwood?
Sorry Joe, couldn't resist.
Paul, I'm always the optimist, but I have to agree with Asher, we won't see 32 car fields again. On top of everything else mentioned, could you see NHRA funding 16 more 1st round losers in TF and FC? Adds up to big numbers, especially over the course of the season. There are a lot of part-timers out there, and they have been showing up more due to the lack of corporate cars these days. What I do think is possible, but probably unlikely, is to have Indy feature 32 cars like the old days, especially if it could be TF AND FC. I still love the "Big Show", but how cool is it that the March Meet will have a 32 car FC show this year? There are a ton of Nostalgia FCs out there and more being built. You want bigger car counts, make it more affordable.
A few thoughts, if I may.
I don’t believe we’ll ever see “bigger fields” again, particularly in the sense of going to 32-car fields. It is simply too expensive to race these cars without major sponsorship support, and if the fields were expanded to 32-cars the “bang for the buck” from the sponsorship perspective would be diluted. Bottom line: In a 32-car field a first or even second round loser is going to be ignored by the media.
What I do think would help drag racing immensely is an expansion of the ENTRY lists to numbers in the high 20s or even low 30s (unlikely). That would make qualifying actually worth seeing.
Paul Sapienza may be right in suggesting there are cars out there, but let’s ask this question: Do you want to see some of those leakers oiling the track and slowing up YOUR show?
Regarding the “media black hole” I referenced in the column, even if Memphis were still hosting a race I would consider it just as much of a negative for drag racing as I do Brainerd. Had Memphis still been on the schedule the week before Indy, and if that’s where the Countdown to 10 ended, how many out-of-town media people do you think would attend? Memphis has never done well in attracting media coverage, and the problem with Brainerd’s location – some three-plus hours from Minneapolis – makes it even worse. Imagine the NHRA Media Department trying to entice someone from out of town into going to Brainerd. It ain’t happenin’ people!
PJ, you certainly don’t have to stop hating the Countdown. It’s your right to protest it ‘til your dying day – but you aren’t going to change it!
Sherwood bribed me to use his name……..
Jon Asher
Senior Editor
CompetitionPlus.com
I've said it before: If you want the sport to grow - you got to grow the sport.
LMAO! Yep, Vegas in 2007!That's that guy you met 4-5 years ago!![]()
LMAO! Yep, Vegas in 2007!
'media black hole' in brainerd or memphis?
one schedule online omits memphis.....thought
this race was still taking place in '10?