brian
Nitro Member
espn claimed that Michigan had a 2-1 record against ranked teams
Right, Notre Dame & Wisconsin, both wins against CURRENT Top 25 teams, however Wisconsin was not ranked at the time of the game.
espn claimed that Michigan had a 2-1 record against ranked teams
I thoroughly agree! He has done an awesome job with that program!stoops has done a fine job, but c'mon the coach of the year has to be Greg Schiano. Seriously, how many of you even knew Rutgers had a football team before this year, then they go and almost win the Big East, and only lost because of a dropped pass on a two point conversion.
I still say the National Championship game was Nov. 18th, say what they will, (sports writers, coaches) the two best college football teams played. I've watched Florida, LSU, USC, Auburn, Louisville, Rutgers, VT, Tennesee, ND, Texas, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Arkansas all play this year. and in my opinion either Michigan or Ohio State were on a differant level. Dont worry PJ Michigan will have its say next year, I dont see anyone standing in thier way in 2007. The gators will be real tasty after New Years
almost every conference affiliated team plays a D1aa team
I'm sure someone will burn me on this but I don't ever remember Michigan playing a d 1aa team.
2 teams roll thru that o' so tough Big 10 this year and you're ready to crown them the best in the land?? Nobody knows unless it's done on the the field. You can't determine the best team by watching them play other teams.
If we (the writers, coaches, myself, nitromater guys/gals) knew exactly what we were talking about, I guess there wouldn't be any of those big hotels and casinos in Vegas Big Ten Champ, yes. National Champ, not just yet.
Big ten non conf had 8 games against teams that are currently ranked sec had 5 (and none by florida)
Yeah, but look at the ranked opponents FU played inside the SEC. Big Ten's best bet is to move Michigan and Ohio State to the same weekend as Big 12/SEC/ACC Championship games. This would somewhat help Michigan in the leap-frogging done this year. Though the majority just didn't want a rematch. Or, and here's an idea, find a team, add them, and have your own Championship game. Sometime down the road, UM vs. OSU will be moved to mid year and the Big Ten will have a title game. Just my thought.
I haven't said it all day so I guess I should get it out of the way.............
GO BUCKEYES!!!
Hey Terry, how about those HUSKERS!!!
Dave, are you feeling any better today?????
Are you sure you want to stand by your assessment that Michigan has never played a 1AA team????
.
Big ten non conf had 8 games against teams that are currently ranked sec had 5 (and none by florida)
Yeah, but look at the ranked opponents FU played inside the SEC. Big Ten's best bet is to move Michigan and Ohio State to the same weekend as Big 12/SEC/ACC Championship games. This would somewhat help Michigan in the leap-frogging done this year. Though the majority just didn't want a rematch. Or, and here's an idea, find a team, add them, and have your own Championship game. Sometime down the road, UM vs. OSU will be moved to mid year and the Big Ten will have a title game. Just my thought.
thats my question though, are they really that good of teams when they fatten there record against so many low teams it's very easy to get to 6 wins when 3 games come against huge nobodies.
Actually in that same conversation was the fact that the Big 10 would be the biggest roadblock for a playoff system. The Big 10 (actually Big 11) is dead set against adding another team & having a conference championship game, and also dead set against a playoff system. They don't like the fact that a "national championship" game was added this year because it devalues the prestigeous Rose Bowl. It is no longer "the grandaddy of them all"... They feel that "playoff" games during the bowls would devalue them. If its not the championship game, its not the "best bowl"....
they've been willing and have tried to have Notre Dame join, but the ncaa gives norte dame so much that there is no point in them joining any conference. They get their own tv deal, get automatic entry into the bcs if they make it to a certain rank. Beyond that the big ten feels that unless they go raid another major confernce that there isn't really a big/good enough mid major that should join them.
______________________________________________________________
Personally I think that there is room for both the bowls and a playoff system. The playoffs are only going to affect 8 teams. This year there are 32 bowls so 64 teams are in. I would love to see 6-6 teams eliminated from going to bowls.
The current bcs game could rotate the semil final and final game. no more bowl ties in, I'd love to see more mid mjor champs taking on (and beating) the 3rd, 4th, 5th place teams from the snob conferences
thats my question though, are they really that good of teams when they fatten there record against so many low teams it's very easy to get to 6 wins when 3 games come against huge nobodies.