Nitromater
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
So you're Alan Johnson
- Thread starter none
- Start date
Thank you for the criticism, you really think I write like this professionally? Do I take mater seriously? No, every f---in post if the bullseye is not on my back it's on somebody else's. That's the game of this site since day one. You can't post on here without ever getting a bullseye posted on your back that gets passed around to a new member each thread.
Who said anything about a car making a left late a holeshot loss or tuning it into a win, this is about the tree and nothing else. This is not about the car being powerful enough to get a win anyway so don't even bring that into this. This is about how the driver and the car reacts, not about the rest of the run, YOU of all people know that a holeshot loss or a leave first stat is all about how the driver reacted, yes it's unforgiving for a slow reacting car, but the car is not always the factor. What you said about Lex means nothing because we are talking about stats that apply to the driver only, not any other person. It's also common sense that not 1 drag car reacts perfect every time.
So you are attacking over facts the we agree with? Yes Brandon had a lot of changes from 2003-2008 in his career, but it's not an excuse. I never said he had no passion because he did, he still was all over the place on the tree and i see effort. I said that his passion and focus must have been greatly affected during that time and that I AM CORRECT saying that his mind and or confidence level was not really focused enough to be able to provide good consistant stats.
So can't you see what I am trying to say without giving me a hard time? And of course I take it personal what you said, It's like my writing I take a ton of heat for not really proof reading or wording in a better way what I write, but when it's for a paycheck, I shape up right away, I'm on this site for a hobby, I do not need to be perfect for a hobby. It's only a blog that people outside of drag racing have no idea even exists, I have several contracts with my employer because when it counts, i write well.
Can you even fully blame me? Your educated, you brought one hell of an example to the table. Does the general public let alone the NHRA stat buffs know anything about what you wrote, Not a chance. The stats in drag racing are EXTREMELY unforgiven and until someone creates a new stat for driver r/t vs. 60 ft vs. when the car affected the start, in a way that people can understand it they will remain an extremely unforgiving stat. Im taking alot of heat because you and chris are more educated on the physics of a racecar. I been paid to calculate and publish driver stats that are extremely blind to every factor but the driver so you can't really want to kill me over me doing my job. I mean no disrespect. So on the other side of the coin, are you saying Brandon's stats would of been better if he has a hadman? And if that's the case, wouldn't the driver make the chassis change for the next order? there is no way Brandon ran 2003-2008 with 1 chassis, so is it fair to say he is not aware of the chassis difference
MM
Nitro Member
No I don't blame you at all, but what I am saying is that you may want to refrain from making outlandish statements such as a driver's level of passion is directly linked to how good their reaction times are. When I think of passionate drivers I think of guys like the Greek. He still works on his car pretty much every day all year round, helps with the service in between rounds and drives the truck and trailer to and from the races at 80+ years of age. However, he has been known to have .200 light from time to time, but that doesn't make me doubt his passion for a second. I am sure you can find an example like this for every driver in every class of competition. Statistics can be very useful tools and interesting conversation topics, but like Chris said earlier, they often do not tell the whole story. When it comes to R/T, some people just have quicker reflexes, just as some people can physically run faster than others.
The chassis example I gave earlier was just that, an example of how a car can consistently effect reaction times. I am not saying that was the case with Brandon. And while you are right, he did not have the same chassis for all those years, the cockpits are often recycled. What I mean by that is when a team decides it's time for new pipe, they will have their current chassis(es) front halved and back halved while keeping the driver's compartment in tact. I believe the one's Brandon uses (or I guess used is the case now) were originally Kenny's.
Last edited:
clwill
Nitro Member
Patrick, perhaps Mike and I can pitch in and buy you a clue.
You waved the Joons claim about holeshot losses in our face as proof of your theory. But, a "holeshot loss" requires two components: leaving second and losing. If you don't lose (because the car made up the difference) it's not a holeshot loss. A car with a tenth on the rest of the field isn't going to get many holeshot losses.
As for chassis, that isn't just the driver's choice. The choice may be the crew chief's, the owner's, heck it might be even some kind of relationship thing ("we've always used Murf's pipe"). They often choose them based on which they feel they can tune better, or that is more consistent, or is easier to work on, or even just fits their motor combo better.
And not only is there the throttle cable setup that Mike discusses, but different pipe reacts differently. Even chassis to chassis, let alone builder to builder. Who knows, maybe Murf put another stiffening cross brace in the later cars and that helped Brandon's RTs.
With every post you make, all you're doing is demonstrating how little you understand about this, and this sport. "Better to keep a closed mouth and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
You waved the Joons claim about holeshot losses in our face as proof of your theory. But, a "holeshot loss" requires two components: leaving second and losing. If you don't lose (because the car made up the difference) it's not a holeshot loss. A car with a tenth on the rest of the field isn't going to get many holeshot losses.
As for chassis, that isn't just the driver's choice. The choice may be the crew chief's, the owner's, heck it might be even some kind of relationship thing ("we've always used Murf's pipe"). They often choose them based on which they feel they can tune better, or that is more consistent, or is easier to work on, or even just fits their motor combo better.
And not only is there the throttle cable setup that Mike discusses, but different pipe reacts differently. Even chassis to chassis, let alone builder to builder. Who knows, maybe Murf put another stiffening cross brace in the later cars and that helped Brandon's RTs.
With every post you make, all you're doing is demonstrating how little you understand about this, and this sport. "Better to keep a closed mouth and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
DrRocket
Nitro Member
Each one is different
It's like that with things that are, for all practical purposes, hand built, one at a time.
I've heard MANY crew chiefs say that you can build the same design chassis on the same jig, using the same material from the same rack, and they'll STILL come out with different personalities.
It's like the old Kentucky long rifle. Each one was hand built, and each one had a differenct feel and a different "sweet spot."
It's like that with things that are, for all practical purposes, hand built, one at a time.
I've heard MANY crew chiefs say that you can build the same design chassis on the same jig, using the same material from the same rack, and they'll STILL come out with different personalities.
It's like the old Kentucky long rifle. Each one was hand built, and each one had a differenct feel and a different "sweet spot."
I have read most of the posts in this thread and am very surprised by some of Patrick's comments as well on passion. There are so many variables like Mike and Chris have stated. The way a top fuel driver stages the car based on the RPM's, the clutch, the pedal, the pedal throw, the driver's eye sight, the lighting, the lane he is in, to many to count. When a driver does not have lane choice they may get in the bad lane because of the lighting, and that affects it big time. One of the factors a crew chief and driver make when they have lane choice is lighting. Someone who is in the bottom half has way more to overcome than the guy who has a better qualified car. When you have 5-8 inches of travel from stage to deep (depending on rollout) the rt can differentiate by a wide margin. It is very difficult to have a top fuel car or flopper roll in consistently do to the clutch and brake handle etc. those 5-8 inches can be as much as .05. If there was a way for a top fuel driver to have the exact same position (many are close ) on the line every time like the super classes or bracket classes, that driver would have a huge advantage race day.
Guys like Langdon, Massey and Torrence and even Antron Brown all cut their teeth in other classes where RTs will win you way more races than having more HP. Top Fuel and Funny car has changed in the last 5 years or decade because the classes have more parity. Force did not need to be as sharp back in the day either did Prudhomme.
Stat's are too one dimensional Patrick, even guys like Bloom and Frey use their vast knowledge of stat's with a disclaimer of sorts.
Your contract with NHRA for the stat book should come with the variables that include the things that Chris and Mike talk about.
The way you word it is way to black and white and this sport is not built that way anymore.
Dean
Guys like Langdon, Massey and Torrence and even Antron Brown all cut their teeth in other classes where RTs will win you way more races than having more HP. Top Fuel and Funny car has changed in the last 5 years or decade because the classes have more parity. Force did not need to be as sharp back in the day either did Prudhomme.
Stat's are too one dimensional Patrick, even guys like Bloom and Frey use their vast knowledge of stat's with a disclaimer of sorts.
Your contract with NHRA for the stat book should come with the variables that include the things that Chris and Mike talk about.
The way you word it is way to black and white and this sport is not built that way anymore.
Dean
I'll settle for what you said. How little I know about this I can't argue that, but how little I know about the sport is really an absurd thing to say and is wayyyy out of line and so inaccurate it's almost laughable. Anyway i admit my fault, moving on
clwill
Nitro Member
I apologize. But only know what I see posted here on the Mater...
I'll give you credit on any comments I made similar to this, but not on the history and facts of the NHRA.
Deuce
Nitro Member
I don't think anyone was questioning you on the facts you posted. It was more about your assumption that "passion" played in those facts.
HEMI6point1
Nitro Member
Bullard Anderson
Nitro Member
I am not going to do a poll or anything but here is my question:
A. Does Alan Johnson have a great eye for talent?
OR
B. Do the guys in the drivers seat have a great ability to not screw up given that beauty of consistent bad azz set up?
A. Does Alan Johnson have a great eye for talent?
OR
B. Do the guys in the drivers seat have a great ability to not screw up given that beauty of consistent bad azz set up?
IMO its all about money. Alan is a very smart guy and he knows it takes money to drag race not Talent. So if Driver A brings a check and Driver B brings talent. Which would you choose? I choose Check. Plus, The Shieks money isn't going to be there forever so it might not be a bad choice to go with the check....JMO
