ProStockJunkie
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 4,406
- Age
- 79
- Location
- New Jersey, USA
If it's obvious to us that the preceding shows are likely to run over, then why aren't they scheduled for a more reasonable time window? Afrer all, the argument against live drag racing coverage is that we might not get finished on time.
Big freakin' deal - neither do most of the other sports ESPN covers live! Rain delays and rainouts? Those happen too, so what's different about drag racing and live coverage? Everybody accepts the "can't cover drag racing live" argument without question, yet accepts the fact that other live sports coverage often runs over their alloted time slot. In fact it happens so often that we have come to expect it whenever a live event precedes drag racing coverage.
Maybe it's time to start pushing for live drag racing coverage again?
I think the difference between live drag racing and other live sports is simple. Oil downs. When other sports are broadcast live, the action continues until it's over. They don't have 1/2 hour gaps in the action like drag racing does when someone granades a motor on a run and the track has to be cleaned up. Unless someone can come up with a way to prevent oil downs, I can't see there ever being fully live coverage of drag racing. It's just the nature of the beast.