- Joined
- Jul 8, 2006
- Messages
- 4,982
- Age
- 47
- Location
- Oswego, IL
There is a solution be creative and aggressive like she stated just like Bernstein and Budweiser they're out there our economy s best it has ever been, money is waiting to spent.qIt was an interesting and surprisingly long article. And yes, it is a good idea for all the parties involved to have these "uncomfortable conversations". And this article may open some doors to these conversations. BUT, I didn't see any real solutions suggested. Like many of you hard core drag racing fans, I have always supported brands that support our sport. I always drank Bud for example, but when they were bought-out they stopped all sports marketing, not just drag racing (so I boycotted them). Many other "official" products have left for other reasons beyond anyone's control. So my question is, other than "talking", what else does she expect NHRA to do ?
I said this recently and got flamed like crazy but it is true....There is a solution be creative and aggressive like she stated just like Bernstein and Budweiser they're out there our economy s best it has ever been, money is waiting to spent.q
good post allan --- i agree with u... its a shame that corprate america companys r just not comming into our sport enough ... lets not condim NASCAR for what they have done , over the yrs they have attracted many many big companys and have kept them ,most, for a long time .. dont get me wrong, i love the sport and car count has been going down from TF to TAFC for yrs ... and , its not NHRA's business to get sponsors for any team , they have enough to do in the organization .. there r marketing companys to serch for u , but , u gotta pay them to do that .. force,shoe,kallitta,tasca,dunn,wilky,etc., they got those deals, with in there on racing company ... we need "MORE" competetive tf/fc's for sure, there r so many slugs out there,they dont help the bump, but ----- there doing the best they can with the experience/budget and etc .. and another thing, lets not replace PS with PM, the same thing might happen to that class ... david dIt was an interesting and surprisingly long article. And yes, it is a good idea for all the parties involved to have these "uncomfortable conversations". And this article may open some doors to these conversations. BUT, I didn't see any real solutions suggested. Like many of you hard core drag racing fans, I have always supported brands that support our sport. I always drank Bud for example, but when they were bought-out they stopped all sports marketing, not just drag racing (so I boycotted them). Many other "official" products have left for other reasons beyond anyone's control. So my question is, other than "talking", what else does she expect NHRA to do ?
Good article that seems more like an effort to reach out to NHRA and ask for cooperation that would benefit all, rather than just bashing them. She presents a laundry list of sponsors - some formerly in the sport – and asks, why not now? Possibly angered and chased off by NHRA policies? NHRA could help by ending the "no competing products" policy that keeps many sponsors away because they are not the “official” this or that brand. After all, if your brand is any good it can withstand a little competition, and a title sponsor is still going to get premier exposure. Competition - hey that's what the sport is about! - is always good for the consumer, and in this case the entire sport.