rckymtn3
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2012
- Messages
- 738
- Age
- 59
- Location
- Back in Texas...Got Ice?
curious....I've seen the posts that hail NASCAR drivers as some sort of pinnacle of driving ability. Stewart and Gordon aside, the rest of them routinely stand in awe of, and often get their a$$es handed to them by true drivers. I speak of Sportscar, Openwheel and Rally drivers. True drivers. Left and Right, off-camber apex followed by a decreasing radius turn going into a half mile straight. I have seen and heard the NASCAR set goober-up when faced with true driving talent. Just this past year they were finally exposed to Austrailian V-8 racing, and were aghast at their ability.
To be fair, I am sure there's more natural driving talent in the NASCAR pool, as there is fewer in the Openwheel set than my comments may suggest (especially Indycar where some drivers are good on ovals and not on the other direction)....but I am equally sure there's as many natural drivers in drag racing. A natural to me is someone that gets into a vehicle and can connect with it, and through that connection, get the utmost out of the car, no matter the venue.
I think drag racing is different, and I think we all understand that. Technical, engineering and mechanical talent plays such a large part in a performance. I think more-so because it's boiled down to such a pure mixture through it's distance and time it takes to complete a lap. There's not 200 laps to absorb subtle mistakes. It's one lap, no mistakes, or fewest mistakes win. It's a sport of perfection unlike any other. Often looked at as easy, most folks see a straight track and assume there's no driving going on, but we know there's some serious driving going on. Someone has to react to a starting system. Someone has to keep the car in the groove, someone has to counteract all the inertia. Someone has to make the straightest line out of a vehicle that wants to do anything but. Yes, there's been great cars that tracked like a slotcar, but again, that goes back to the technical excellence.
Drag racing is different, and it's hard to compare to other motorsports, and that's just the way I like it.
To be fair, I am sure there's more natural driving talent in the NASCAR pool, as there is fewer in the Openwheel set than my comments may suggest (especially Indycar where some drivers are good on ovals and not on the other direction)....but I am equally sure there's as many natural drivers in drag racing. A natural to me is someone that gets into a vehicle and can connect with it, and through that connection, get the utmost out of the car, no matter the venue.
I think drag racing is different, and I think we all understand that. Technical, engineering and mechanical talent plays such a large part in a performance. I think more-so because it's boiled down to such a pure mixture through it's distance and time it takes to complete a lap. There's not 200 laps to absorb subtle mistakes. It's one lap, no mistakes, or fewest mistakes win. It's a sport of perfection unlike any other. Often looked at as easy, most folks see a straight track and assume there's no driving going on, but we know there's some serious driving going on. Someone has to react to a starting system. Someone has to keep the car in the groove, someone has to counteract all the inertia. Someone has to make the straightest line out of a vehicle that wants to do anything but. Yes, there's been great cars that tracked like a slotcar, but again, that goes back to the technical excellence.
Drag racing is different, and it's hard to compare to other motorsports, and that's just the way I like it.
Last edited: