Tom
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2006
- Messages
- 224
- Age
- 49
- Location
- Stockton, CA
Perhaps they read the Mater and wanted to update people on where the case is?
I agree that people who break the rules should be held accountable, and it's hard to argue that DSR didn't have the nitro. The way NHRA handled it was pretty sad. Light on TV -- why do that? Should've been a private matter. And the 1.3.1 rule they violated is all about "participant conduct" -- like disparaging the sport or NHRA, that kind of thing. What's that about?
But all in all, hard to say the rule book should apply in some cases and not others. That's what the appeals process is about. Perhaps we should let that take its course?
That's the same kind of BS they do EVERY TIME ANYTHING happens in ASSCAR, whether a car didn't pass tech, a fight broke out, someone cursed in an interview, etc. "Section 12-4-A - Actions detrimental to stock car racing". I called a tech official a C.S. and that is the rule they quoted as well. So, I typed out 12-4-a - "Actions detrimental to Stock Car Racing and stuffed them into fortune cookies, put them in a bag, and passed them out to officials at the next race (after I appealed my $500 fine). The bag said "Official 2006 NASCAR Rulebook - Revised". They could have FIT the entire ASSCAR rule book in a fortune cookie, because that is the only rule they ever quoted or used. I never did pay the fine, and the track ended up closing after the 2006 season.
Last edited: