Sorry, but I pay to see cars going down the 1/4 mile. If NHRA did that to a race I went to I'd be pretty pissed off.
And IHRA has now had TWO events that they had to run in 1/8 mile? People say that IHRA has great track prep. Yeah, great track prep alright.
Sorry, but I pay to see cars going down the 1/4 mile. If NHRA did that to a race I went to I'd be pretty pissed off.
Sorry, but I pay to see cars going down the 1/4 mile. If NHRA did that to a race I went to I'd be pretty pissed off.
And IHRA has now had TWO events that they had to run in 1/8 mile? People say that IHRA has great track prep. Yeah, great track prep alright.
Kind of a weird deal and crappy for those trying to back up a record and the dial-in and throttle stop "Rod" classes who don't get to make a time trial at the new distance.
With the one lane race tracks that NHRA put out what is better? One lane at a 1/4 mile or two lanes at an 1/8. No one wanted to have to come back. It was the water not the prep.
Sorry, but I pay to see cars going down the 1/4 mile. If NHRA did that to a race I went to I'd be pretty pissed off.
And IHRA has now had TWO events that they had to run in 1/8 mile? People say that IHRA has great track prep. Yeah, great track prep alright.
Actually I personally believe IHRA preps their tracks better than NHRA. Sometimes too good. Our 3.10 @ 275 (1/8th mile) on Monday on a 110 degree track is a testament to that.
Joe, I don't care if it was on the moon or 20,000 leagues under the sea...the point is...you still have to have a race track under you to hold such a run, to chalk it up as a "good air" run is just plain bullshit, come and taste the water before you make such a statement.Mike, while that's a decent number it's maybe a 4.55 which is common in TF. I will say that IHRA tracks get much better air then NHRA events! Not sure if that's geographics, time of year for those tracks or what.