Throughout this debate about the value or benefits of suing or not suing over an incident like this a number of good ideas/thoughts have come forth. But ,the first one that made any sense to me about the actual sport of drag racing was Jim Gunther’s comment: “Rather than debating comparative negligence or joint and several liability, we ought to (from a PR perspective) get in front of public opinion and let folks know ‘that ain’t drag racing.’”
Has it occurred to anyone that by making some of the comments posted here that we may be supplying attorneys with fodder for their pending cases? It’s possible that statements published here could be entered as “evidence” of the opinions of so-called “expert observers of drag racing,” opinions that could damage the sport.
We should let this issue fade out of consciousness for a bit, I think. If we keep on going as this discussion has so far we’re going to be bringing up more and more topics that have the potential to either damage the sport, or tip some sue-happy individual about some of the potential areas he might bring suit about.
What happened in Tennessee was unfortunate at best and tragic at worst, and we aren’t helping by speculating about so many things that we can’t prove one way or the other. As people who allegedly know more about drag racing than the average man on the street we’re in a position to possibly have a negative impact on the outcome of the pending legal actions.
Bottom line: I think we oughta shut up about this, at least for now.
But hey, that’s only my opinion.
Jon Asher