turbo ken
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2006
- Messages
- 1,046
- Age
- 59
- Location
- San Antonio, Tx
The NHRA is run by hacks!!!
I once picked a 20 lb. weight bar that was on the track in the lights in my parachute. I know it was bolted on the right way 3/8 bolts-2 of them because it came of my own car - surprise - surprise.Tough deal, but…
#1- Weight can NOT fall off a race car. Cars shake/pedal/wheelstand all the time and that’s not an excuse. If the “plug” came loose, there needs to be a better plug. I can think of 2 serious crashes caused by weight falling off top fuel cars. 1 was off their own car, the other hit a piece of weight sitting in the lights that had just fallen off another car. Can’t happen.
#2- When the loose weight was returned, there should have at least been a conversation that at least said “Hey, this breaks rule X, there is going to be a penalty TBA…” just to let them know something was coming. An e-mail that late is kind of a bad deal. Just some recent rules infractions from some of the funny cars with headers, as well as with the team Elite PS cars were all known pretty quick. I don’t disagree with the penalty however. Just needed better and a more timely delivery.
#3 Unfortunate how this news kinda lingered out. Millican and team were completely and falsely thrown under the bus on a podcast which had some very inaccurate information. That kind of stuff shouldn’t happen. Not fair to Rick, Clay or anybody on the team.
that would be considered an incident out of control of the team or driver so no penalty unless there is an oil down which was penalized.in 2018 matt hagan and robert hight had double blow-ups shredding both bodies at finish line of round 2 FC gatornationals.
parts by both racers were deposited onto the racing surface as a result of their engines failing. parts and pieces shattered and flew everywhere.
would those parts and pieces have not shattered and flown everywhere if engines had not failed? was there an intent to cheat when the parts and pieces
flew everywhere as a result of this double on-track incident? matt's win stood, and he went onto win the semi-finals. all he lost was 5 points.
....... DRC copy/paste from that round
This was a strange one. Hagan gets the advantage of the line but Hight gets around him before they reach the sixty foot mark. Hight staysin front to the 660 foot mark, then the engine explodes sending the body flying into the air. Hagan gets around him and just before the finish line his engine explodes sending the body into the air. Hight crosses over into the right lane behind Hagan, then he steers it back over to the left and brings it to a stop. Hagan gets out of the car and all he wants to know is "Did we win?".
Matt Hagan's incremental margins (negative if behind): 60ft(-0.009), 330 ft(-0.003), 660ft(-0.002).MOV: 0.0474 seconds (approximately 18 feet).
Matt Hagan was charged with an oildown, #1 for the season. That will cost 5 points and $1K.
Hight will be charged with crossing the centerline and will be charged 5 points.
In Nascar it's supposedly a neutral third party group of people who are not currently affiliated with Nascar. Some used to be and some never have. My guess is Nhra is nothing like that. I think Nhra is currently "asleep at the wheel". I also see both sides but why was Clay's team penalized for the entire race weekend and not just the one run where the infraction occured? Nhra is not Nascar. They followed the rule book as it's written as Clay pointed out and after a on track incident they suddenly broke the rules. Nhra is not being transparent like Nascar currently is. Would hate to see RWR pull out of Nhra, they already have too many short fields.I wouldn't call them hacks, I see both sides of this. A rule is a rule, but there are certain circumstances like a wheel stand where common sense needs to be applied. When a racer appeals a penalty, is it to a neutral 3rd party to review or is it the NHRA that has the final say?
Clay is wrong, there is NO contradiction in the rules. Go back to 2:00 - The NHRA rule states that LOOSE shot bags are not allowed, all ballast must be PERMANENTLY ATTACHED. Go to 3:10 - shot bags are allowed if they are contained INSIDE AN APPROPRATELY ATTACHED weight box. He admitted that the shot bag fell from the car as the front wheels came off the ground and a plug fell out, indicating the shot bag WAS NOT properly secured. The team violated a SAFETY rule. As far as stating that ANY other motorsport sanctioning body would be quicker to announce a penalty, that is ridiculous assumption made by Clay. If RWR doesn't agree with the NHRA rules, they don't have to participate.the way clay read the rules, it seemed somewhat contradictory. shot bag disallowed, then in next paragraph it talks about the use of them.
i agree with clay, that there are parts failures all the time depositing parts onto racetrack, yet said car gets win and advances.
what is difference between a shot bag, a piece of body panel, a bolt, a parachute that comes off, or a wheel failure with car staying in lane.
i guess i would understand a DQ of that particular run, which would end clay's day, but the DQ and no points seems a bit over the top.
somehow this whole circus functions because of smart decisions made by the nhra, the track owners, the sponsors, and the racers.
a decision like this only leaves sour taste in mouth of a new owner and sponsors coming into sport......plus the dollars it cost the team.
So you think 6 days is ok?Clay is wrong, there is NO contradiction in the rules. Go back to 2:00 - The NHRA rule states that LOOSE shot bags are not allowed, all ballast must be PERMANENTLY ATTACHED. Go to 3:10 - shot bags are allowed if they are contained INSIDE AN APPROPRATELY ATTACHED weight box. He admitted that the shot bag fell from the car as the front wheels came off the ground and a plug fell out, indicating the shot bag WAS NOT properly secured. The team violated a SAFETY rule. As far as stating that ANY other motorsport sanctioning body would be quicker to announce a penalty, that is ridiculous assumption made by Clay. If RWR doesn't agree with the NHRA rules, they don't have to participate.
Is there a stipulation in the rules that they are allowed if they are inside a sealed secure container and how that it is mounted and what is made out ofthe way clay read the rules, it seemed somewhat contradictory. shot bag disallowed, then in next paragraph it talks about the use of them.
i agree with clay, that there are parts failures all the time depositing parts onto racetrack, yet said car gets win and advances.
what is difference between a shot bag, a piece of body panel, a bolt, a parachute that comes off, or a wheel failure with car staying in lane.
i guess i would understand a DQ of that particular run, which would end clay's day, but the DQ and no points seems a bit over the top.
somehow this whole circus functions because of smart decisions made by the nhra, the track owners, the sponsors, and the racers.
a decision like this only leaves sour taste in mouth of a new owner and sponsors coming into sport......plus the dollars it cost the team.
The secured container is the tube that also holds the front wing to the chassis, the tow strap hook is removeable so the weight can be put in.Is there a stipulation in the rules that they are allowed if they are inside a sealed secure container and how that it is mounted and what is made out of