Nitrohaulic
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 2,674
- Age
- 59
- Location
- Friendsville, TN
Unfortunately, NHRA would have a legal option if BUSINESSES cooperated for their mutual benefit. BUSINESSES that share the same customer(s) can't boycott. They can collude, which is illegal.
Kind of like how a group of people engaging in price fixing is collective bargaining. Businesses that engage in collective bargaining are price fixing.
People want different rules for businesses when it has to do with something they want, then want the rules changed.......for something they want. Can't have it both ways. NHRA could have stopped PRO based on this years ago. You can't pick and choose, having socialism when it benefits you, then have capitalism when it benefits you.
What should teams do? Try to bury a provision in future contracts that allows them to sit out one or more races if the owner perceives that the payouts aren't enough? Pro rated budget cuts? What if the payouts are the same as when the contract was signed? How are you going to have a point person who says "The teams sitting out demand this...." AND say "....but, they're not cooperating against you."
I think the only thing that can legally happen here is market forces at work. The problem is that teams are parking because of advertiser loss. Who is parking while saying "We have a sponsor available but, have decided not to run until NHRA ups the money"? When would that ever happen? Don't think so.
The owners allowed this sport to become advertiser dependent. The first time the biggest thing on the side of someone's car was a sponsor instead of a nickname. That person lowered the bar for everyone. That person created an edge for themselves at the time but, caused everyone to eventually have to be corporate wh**es. The teams are having to sleep in their own beds now.
Maybe if it weren't for all that, the sport would still be where it was 20 years ago. E.T. gains would have come more slowly and it would all still be relative to all the hardcore fans. We wouldn't be this close to the wall. I'd be happier if the first four hadn't even been run yet. This is NOT where you want to be when the money runs out, huh?
Kind of like how a group of people engaging in price fixing is collective bargaining. Businesses that engage in collective bargaining are price fixing.
People want different rules for businesses when it has to do with something they want, then want the rules changed.......for something they want. Can't have it both ways. NHRA could have stopped PRO based on this years ago. You can't pick and choose, having socialism when it benefits you, then have capitalism when it benefits you.
What should teams do? Try to bury a provision in future contracts that allows them to sit out one or more races if the owner perceives that the payouts aren't enough? Pro rated budget cuts? What if the payouts are the same as when the contract was signed? How are you going to have a point person who says "The teams sitting out demand this...." AND say "....but, they're not cooperating against you."
I think the only thing that can legally happen here is market forces at work. The problem is that teams are parking because of advertiser loss. Who is parking while saying "We have a sponsor available but, have decided not to run until NHRA ups the money"? When would that ever happen? Don't think so.
The owners allowed this sport to become advertiser dependent. The first time the biggest thing on the side of someone's car was a sponsor instead of a nickname. That person lowered the bar for everyone. That person created an edge for themselves at the time but, caused everyone to eventually have to be corporate wh**es. The teams are having to sleep in their own beds now.
Maybe if it weren't for all that, the sport would still be where it was 20 years ago. E.T. gains would have come more slowly and it would all still be relative to all the hardcore fans. We wouldn't be this close to the wall. I'd be happier if the first four hadn't even been run yet. This is NOT where you want to be when the money runs out, huh?
Last edited: