Bowtie
Nitro Member
this is what I find interesting
He spent what he didn't have, but who in their right mind would loan someone money based on repayments from the government, wonder if the bank will loan me money because a loanshark owes me a refund?![Big Grin :D :D](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png)
And it sounds like all of this will go away should he get his money from the government.
If this is the case, then he is entitled to the refund.
the IRS currently is withholding payment of more than $19.5 million in federal fuel-excise tax rebates that Knoll's Torco Racing Fuels company had claimed for two quarters in 2007 and 2008. The government refunds were used to collateralize a $15 million loan that Chemical Bank made to Knoll's company.
He spent what he didn't have, but who in their right mind would loan someone money based on repayments from the government, wonder if the bank will loan me money because a loanshark owes me a refund?
![Big Grin :D :D](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png)
And it sounds like all of this will go away should he get his money from the government.
Knoll's company claims it paid excise taxes when it bought thousands of gallons of fuel from four sources that were blended to produce its racing grades, according to documents filed with the government and included in the Chemical Bank case.
According to the documents, Torco says it did not pass those taxes on to its customers who used its formulas in race cars. Excise taxes are charged for fuel used in street vehicles. The company said it filed for the rebates to recoup the excise taxes it paid to the government.
If this is the case, then he is entitled to the refund.