HEMI6point1
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2006
- Messages
- 3,902
- Age
- 42
- Location
- The sunshine state via NY.
You guys crack me up. I take it that Force's tire smoker against a blown-up Capps in round 2 was a dive as well, right?
You guys crack me up. I take it that Force's tire smoker against a blown-up Capps in round 2 was a dive as well, right?
Don't be stupid.
Wheres the common sense?? What does force / capps race have to do with force intentionally losing to Robert??So now we're getting into insults just because I injected some common sense into this thread?
I totally agree with you Jim, but it doesn't change the fact that it wasn't to be expected. Also, how does the NHRA prove anything to enforce consequences?This grown-up fan doesn't accept nor lay out hard earned ticket money to see "professional" racers dive for any reason. I accept the fact that sometimes my favorite driver may not win any given round, but I'm a believer in "run whatcha brung and hope you brung enough" drag racing. Drag racing is (or should be) a sport where the baddest guy on the property wins, not one where races are faked or thrown. I see business decisions at work all week, I don't need to see it on my weekends. If NHRA allows this without consequence then why not let WWE sanction the races from now on?
But it is Pro Stock and only about a half dozen people care.I totally agree with you Jim, but it doesn't change the fact that it wasn't to be expected. Also, how does the NHRA prove anything to enforce consequences?
Greg Anderson and Jason Line are two guys that know how to run a team. I can never recall them not running heads up.
But it is Pro Stock and only about a half dozen people care.
Actually 6 people....
I totally agree with you Jim, but it doesn't change the fact that it wasn't to be expected. Also, how does the NHRA prove anything to enforce consequences?
Greg Anderson and Jason Line are two guys that know how to run a team. I can never recall them not running heads up.
Agreed. However, why does NHRA need concrete proof? Look at baseball, my other favorite sport, the umpire makes a judgment call (on balls and strikes at least) and that's it. No appeals or argument allowed. If every fan and every racer with 2 function eyes can see something, why can't the NHRA? If Force doesn't like it, let him cut a decent light and at least make a good showing next time. Toss out both he and Robert and I promise you won't see such and obvious forfeit next time. Just my .02 cents, I could be wrong...
It's actually quite a reasonable comparison. A baseball ump has a couple tenths of a second to make a snap judgment that could impact the game. If NHRA would get their head out of the sand and quit pretending the racing is honest, then they could review it, and if things like a hugely abnormal reaction time, coupled with a car driving out of the lane (with no cylinders out, BTW) and a lot riding on the outcome of the race then a reasonable person could come to the conclusion that the fans, competitors and the sport were compromised for one person's monetary gain. Pete Rose did a lot less and was banned for life.Don't get me wrong, because I believe Force did it on purpose, but comparing baseball to the unpredictability of nitro racing is just ridiculous. Yes, he cut a horrible light, and yes, the car went towards the wall, but damn, that happens at every race across multiple classes. My point is, having someone make a judgement call on something that is so unpredictable is just asking for more trouble compared to just leaving it alone. JMO.