History shows powerful opinion always provokes powerful reaction. But that reaction means nothing unless it seeks to at least address the problem the initial opinion suggested.
Meaning, only a fool would deny the existence of deep and ugly problems within the NHRA. And neither of you two gentlemen strikes me as a fool.
So I'd like to hear what YOU would propose to correct the direction of the NHRA. Or am I to assume, by the vigor of your responses, that you think everything is hunky dory?
Doc