This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
One thing I didn’t get was why didn’t they use post-stressed concrete the full length of the track? How is the Motorplex now vs. what it was years ago (They said they ground it down once and that was it. Very low maintenance). I was really hoping he would ask Kurt Johnson that question, but he didn’t.
Is it an expense thing (totally understandable if asphalt is a lot better than it used to be).
if i remember correctly watching this video, doesn't he say something about other nat. event tracks that are 1/2 and 1/2, produce stellar performance?
so they did not think they needed the expense of 100% concrete? i watched this, but as brian mentioned, it was a few weeks ago. i think joe drove over there for this interview
following the topeka race
He did say that concrete/asphalt was an excellent surface. Hard to imagine that it would be better than post-stress concrete, however I’m sure the cost differential is substantial. I’m not even sure there are ANY post stress concrete tracks out there other than the Motorplex. All concrete, sure. Post stress….don’t know about that one.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.