Dave beat me to it... I'm also a S/C racer, and I think all these high speeds are too much... We run ours like a cadillac at 165 MPH... We could go faster, but we don't see a reason to increase the risk of parts or more importantly my life...
Greg, yes it gives an advantage... I admit I'm guessing at 1000' where the high speed cars are.. But I've seen them crash their cars at those speeds... There's guys with LOADS of experience who crash, and don't you think "maybe" 20 MPH slower and they would have a better chance at keeping their car under control?
I locked the brakes at the finish line earlier this year, and thank god I wasn't going 190... When that happened my first thought/reaction was to look and see where the other guy was (just in case crap happened)... You have to realize when you increase the risk in your car to give you a little better edge, you are also risking the guy next to you... I don't think that's something I could do...
The mentality of "faster is better" is why people build such fast dragsters... The side effect is people who can afford it only want the best, and some new drivers get more speed than they are prepared for... I see this a lot with T/S...
I don't think anyone's opinion is wrong, but my personal choice is safety over speed.
CJ Curtsinger
That's a very valid a good point CJ...However there are a few things I'd like to ask ya...
1) Why did you lock em up at the top end? Was it to avoid the break-out, because your car was set on running about .02-.03 under the index?
I think this is the main reason most of the "LOCKING THE HYDES" accidents occur. We're trying to take a small stripe and many drivers make that last SPLIT SECOND decision to "SLAM THE BRAKES"... this is Driver error, and occures whether the car is doing 165 or 190. I too have made this error in my past, heck I've literally had the rear tires in the air over the finish line because I hit the brakes so hard... I kept the car straight, but it was LUCK! I think the problem is not the Speed of the Faster cars causing the accidents, it's the SET UP of the car, (trying to kill .03 in less than 100' is really tough and Dangerous...even with a Link Chassis) and the driver's Judgement in hitting the brakes HARD that ultimatly causes the accident.
2) You said earlier that "You have to realize when you increase the risk in your car to give you a little better edge, you are also risking the guy next to you... I don't think that's something I could do.."..
Well actually not really. When your going faster, you see the entire race ahead of you and you can make the appropriate changes, (IE WOMPIN THE THROTTLE, SLOWING THE CAR WITH BRAKE) more than the slower car, who is #1... LOOKING BEHIND THEM AT THE OTHER CAR (not looking in front of them to see where they are going, and you've been to Hawley's class....Remember where the Eye's go...the Hands Instinctivly follow...) so the slow car is usually not going STRAIGHT when they "Lock the brakes". When this happens, the chassis is more likely to UNLOAD and the accidents occur. The faster car, your looking at a point on that car, but also FORWARD. The car tends to go straighter, and if the brakes lock up, it's more likely to stay going straight.
I agree with the concept that Sometimes FASTER is Not better. But, I can't prescribe to the PROBLEM is the speed of the super class cars argument. I think it's more Driver error, and parts failure, but the difference in speed, (in my opinion) is not the factor in why these accidents occur.