Nitrohelper
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 641
- Age
- 79
- Location
- Beertown in Cheeseland
Are you interested in running the propster class.....a shot of Franklin please....
Are you interested in running the propster class.....a shot of Franklin please....
In the only classes that matter to MOST spectators, Funny Car and Top Fuel, there is rules parity (which is what we are talking about here, rules). There are no "one off" combinations only available to one team. The big, well funded teams obviously have an advantage, but their advantage is people and parts inventory, not the rule book. So I will disagree with you Darr that parity is keeping fans away. Now whether some folks are turned off by the same few teams winning most of the events is a different story for a different thread.
I also disagree that NHRA needs to create more classes, there are too many now as it is. It is fine that A/Fuel and TAD run together, it would be ludicrous for NHRA to create seperate classes for cars that run within a few hundredths of each other, and to the untrained eye, look pretty much the same. Besides, the car counts are not high enough to support A/Fuel and TAD as seperate classes. Who would fund them as seperate classes for event and championship purses?
Pro Mod is the same ... the turbo deal will eventually be reeled back in so that the blown cars and nitrous cars will be competitive. There is no reason to have 3 seperate Pro Mod categories. Again, car count is an issue and funding is an issue.
And whomever said Blown and Nitrous Pro Mods didn't race together in IHRA is just flat wrong. They never split them up, and the rules changed from race to race in IHRA in the late 90s and early 2000s, 20 pounds here, less over drive there. Ask Shannon Jenkins or Scotty Cannon about the old IHRA and get comfortable ... it will be a long conversation.
The nitro teams are wide open and it's more talent and money.
Chris, the NHRA has most recently been a sanctioning body of appeasement with large wallets always getting the attention of the Suits in Glendora. You can think and feel what you wish, but I can tell you from experience that Parity is one of the reasons that has helped to drive spectators away from NHRA Drag Racing.
Would it matter to the casual spectator if Pro Stock Bike were dropped from the 2013 schedule, NO. Sure there'd be a few on this board who would scream, but NHRA needs to move to the business model adopted by IHRA, a two day Pro Show in a traveling circus, eight car fields with one day of qualifying - one day of eliminations. Pro Top Fuel, Pro Funny Car, Pro Stock, Pro Mod and Nitro Harley. Nitro is what people pay money for, Pro Stock is today's multi-millionaire golf game, nothing more - nothing less and is a big enough throwback that a few spectators will stick around.
There is plenty of drag racing for everyone outside of the NHRA Big Tent Circus, the BIG Show is no longer attainable for anyone without incredibly deep-pocket connections, make it a Pro Only Show and move on from the past. NHRA can exert Parity to the best of their abilities and everyone can get a Wally.
Cynical, maybe... Realist, always.
Come on Joe, dont tell me you dont remember Franklin Ratcliffe or Ratliff or whatever the hell it was.
dream on Patrick...
Your telling me to dream on and anyone that thinks otherwise to what you posted based on what? Your opinion? Why should I agree with empty claims that parity drives away fans and the NHRA needs to model the IHRA when you provide nothing but the attitude that you somehow know and that it right. Ok so if you know expand on it. Yea I wrote nothing but an opinion but it's a lot easier to make sense out of the reasons i provided. Instead of just trying to discredit my right to post my view, why dont you offer up how or why you claim what you know is the surefire reasons. What's your evidence on parity having a negative result on the fans? Fans want to see tight, close racing that gives more than 2-3 teams a chance to win on sunday, but your telling me i'm wrong.
What's your evidence on parity having a negative result on the fans?
The ideal for "parity" in Pro Stock Bike would be that every motorcycle in competition has to pull the same pounds per cubic inch.
That's "Parity." That's what we have in Pro Stock, Top Fuel and Fuel Funny Car.
It's not Suzuki's fault that Harley Davidson engine design technology is based on an 80-year-old antique; one that was flawed from the git-go.
How close would the racing be, if the PS Harleys had to weigh 900 pounds?
That's what they would have to weigh, if PSM were adjudicated like the other Pro classes.
The Emperor has NO CLOTHES... except that NHRA has apparently been bought and paid for by Harley Davidson, and this is the result; Harley-design domination through Draconian legislation, and NHRA manages to keep a lid on it for them.
In respect to that, have you EVER heard an announcer at an NHRA national event point out to the fans that the Jap bikes have to pull 50+-percent more weight-per cubic-inch down the track, than the ALL AMERICAN HARLEYS????
I haven't.... wonder why?
No... I don't... $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Parity; NHRA jumped on the turbocharged Pro Mods with BOTH FEET as soon as they started winning a couple of races. No matter that they went for years, in R & D, trying to get those cars competitive, never winning a thing.
This current H-D charade has been going on in PSM for a long time...
When NHRA WANTS "parity," they make it happen. Instantly.
When they don't, to say that you're wasting your breath even discussing it, it to seriously under-state the case.
They do what they WANT to do... $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Patrick, I apologize, I was sucked into your Keenan vortex... my mistake. I don't want to play.
the ideal for "parity" in pro stock bike would be that every motorcycle in competition has to pull the same pounds per cubic inch.
That's "parity." that's what we have in pro stock, top fuel and fuel funny car.
It's not suzuki's fault that harley davidson engine design technology is based on an 80-year-old antique; one that was flawed from the git-go.
How close would the racing be, if the ps harleys had to weigh 900 pounds?
That's what they would have to weigh, if psm were adjudicated like the other pro classes.
The emperor has no clothes... Except that nhra has apparently been bought and paid for by harley davidson, and this is the result; harley-design domination through draconian legislation, and nhra manages to keep a lid on it for them.
In respect to that, have you ever heard an announcer at an nhra national event point out to the fans that the jap bikes have to pull 50+-percent more weight-per cubic-inch down the track, than the all american harleys????
I haven't.... Wonder why?
No... I don't... $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
parity; nhra jumped on the turbocharged pro mods with both feet as soon as they started winning a couple of races. No matter that they went for years, in r & d, trying to get those cars competitive, never winning a thing.
This current h-d charade has been going on in psm for a long time...
When nhra wants "parity," they make it happen. Instantly.
When they don't, to say that you're wasting your breath even discussing it, it to seriously under-state the case.
They do what they want to do... $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$