The stuff coming out of South America on this topic is nothing but hot air. Actually proving something is far more difficult than making an accusation.
After Ayrton Senna's death Italian prosecutors decided to take action, and I know I'm not going to remember this correctly, but they levied charges against several people, including other drivers and even team officials. A lengthy and costly trial took place, with everyone walking away free because it was impossible to "prove" that either another driver was responsible in any intentional way, nor did the team intentionally provide him with a defective car.
Regarding Kalitta, two situations come to mind. One, at the Gators, involved Doug racing Grubnic (I think!). Kalitta was asked by the media who would win. He replied, "We're racin'. 'Course, that's now. Later in the year things could be different."
When the situation came up in Brainerd and he was asked about Doug racing Scott, his reply was, "Scott's just out here havin' some fun, but Doug's racing for the championship, so who do you think is gonna win?"
Unless and until some utterly foolish racer says, PRIOR to his race, "Yeah, I'm going in the tank for my teammate," or says at the finish line, "I had to lose. My team owner told me to," nothing's going to change. I don't care how many computer readouts you check, NHRA can't prove much of anything in this area.
And don't you think the guys tuning these cars aren't smart enough to add just enough to the clutch to smoke the tires at 300 feet? Without being blatantly obvious about it?
Racers are going to dive, period. We may not like it, but from a business perspective, it's often the right thing to do.
Jon Asher
Senior Editor
CompetitionPlus.com