I hope this post never falls into the hands of a non drag racing fanMaybe Brit needs to stick it in deep like her daddy to make up for her slow RT's.
I think this is a bad choice of words.Maybe Brit needs to stick it in deep like her daddy to make up for her slow RT's.
Why? It's just drag racing slang. Roll it in deep, stick ( or stuck ) it in deep.I think this is a bad choice of words.
No way will I turn on Josh, this story seems a bit strange though, with Josh racing in A/Fuel with (I believe} all 3 Force Girls, who you never hear about getting into controversies with fellow competitorsNow you've done it Tony. All the JFR fans are going to turn on Josh.
I hope this post never falls into the hands of a non drag racing fan
There have been a couple races where the car’s performance fell off on race day, but the car performs about 90% of the time while the driver performs about 10%. She is always second on the lights. Sad but true. There are drivers who will personally win you x races a year and some who will personally lose you x races. No doubt where she falls. Needs work quick.People like to harp on reaction times but nobody ever talks about how the car randomly falls off performance wise.
She went down a whole tenth this past weekend. Had Hart beat, reaction time and all, until the cylinders went out. Anyone thinking that cylinders had nothing to do with that race, wasn't watching the same race as me.
The ‘like her daddy’ part didn’t help.I think this is a bad choice of words.
The car outperforms the field and then drops back to earth a round later. The car got slower and slower in Charlotte. Hart ran his best of the day in the finals. She ran her worst. Nearly the same thing in Reading. 3.66, 3.65, 3.70, and then 3.77 when she lost to Billy. The car performing 90% of the time is a way bigger number than what it actually is.There have been a couple races where the car’s performance fell off on race day, but the car performs about 90% of the time while the driver performs about 10%. She is always second on the lights. Sad but true. There are drivers who will personally win you x races a year and some who will personally lose you x races. No doubt where she falls. Needs work quick.
Obviously, you don't pay attention to the temperature as the day progresses. Take Steve Torrence for instance, He ran in the 60's then final round pulled a 3.73. Track and air temperature play a huge factor in what they will run.The car outperforms the field and then drops back to earth a round later. The car got slower and slower in Charlotte. Hart ran his best of the day in the finals. She ran her worst. Nearly the same thing in Reading. 3.66, 3.65, 3.70, and then 3.77 when she lost to Billy. The car performing 90% of the time is a way bigger number than what it actually is.
Obviously I do. They fall off drastically while others climb or hover around the same numbers.Obviously, you don't pay attention to the temperature as the day progresses. Take Steve Torrence for instance, He ran in the 60's then final round pulled a 3.73. Track and air temperature play a huge factor in what they will run.
The truth is .... she’s not very good at this. I’m a Force family fan but it is what it is. If I were John, I’d be having a war room like session to identify everything that can help. She has a chance to win this year but with no improvement she won’t do well next year either. Too many cars and drivers catching up. Brainstorming options like:
Testing with a real tree and car (the immediate path)
Sports psychologist
Mentoring from the best drivers
Car setup
Physical characteristics (leg position, shoes, whatever)
Etc.
For someone struggling on the tree, I would always stage first and develop a routine.