Pro Stock was built on many brands competing with many different engines. Now we have 20 Camaros with a 50-50 split of same spec engines from two main builders, spec racing at its worst.
I could not think of another worse business model.
Now we will change the rules once again to try and level the playing field. So all the current FI systems will be shelved and everyone will be running the new system because it will be faster. So we will be back to one style of car with the same repetitive engine set up.
The only reason it is close racing is there is no innovation left, they have gotten all they can out of existing tech and rules package. And if they let carbs back in they will all go back to carbs because carbs are faster.................
"Now we have 20 Camaros with a 50-50 split of same spec engines from two main builders, spec racing at its worst.
I could not think of another worse business model."
But isn't this essentially the model for Funny Car? It is, IMHO, even more rediculous to give manufacturer car names to funny car bodies, when the only difference is the paint/wrap. (Just like NASCAR, yuk.)
Maybe the same can be said for the model of PSM. I don't hear/read who appear to be seemingly anti-GM people on here refer to that class as "Pro-Suzuki" even though the same conditions affect that class.
Not arguing, but trying to take an objective look at it. I agree with the other posts that desire more body styles competing in PS, and I wanted to see "foreign" cars involved for many years in PS, but it never happened for "reasons". Would love to have seen a PS Altima Coupe, or a older PS BMW 328 coupe, etc.
I tend to also agree with points of Steve's post above too. Kind of that old adage "build a better mousetrap".
But, I have to concede, it may be too late for much to change for better/more competitive options in PS.