sdwarf36
Nitro Member
To get back on track--
I doubt its 50 hp-25 or 30 maybe. HD's always had the best back half-they just now have a decent 60ft to go with the package. (picture this "green towel" moment-what if all this sudden burst of performance has to do with clutch rather than HP
)
It seems that the Buell +Suzuki are pretty even at the moment-lets leave them alone. There is 20 years into the 2 valve head for the Suzuki. A 4 valve head would be nice-but it would cost those teams a bundle. (And the money ends up back to V+H who build most? all? of them.)
I seem to remember that the Buells dont have a lot of weight to lose.
I say knock off 15 cu in. of the HD's. Napkin math says probably a bit over 2 hp per cube. There used to be 2 different displacements for 2 to 4 valve-preceded has been set.
I dont want them too far behind the 8 ball- I want 3 makes having an equal chance. Give them plenty of time to test + have a working combo by mid season.
I doubt its 50 hp-25 or 30 maybe. HD's always had the best back half-they just now have a decent 60ft to go with the package. (picture this "green towel" moment-what if all this sudden burst of performance has to do with clutch rather than HP
![Confused :confused: :confused:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png)
It seems that the Buell +Suzuki are pretty even at the moment-lets leave them alone. There is 20 years into the 2 valve head for the Suzuki. A 4 valve head would be nice-but it would cost those teams a bundle. (And the money ends up back to V+H who build most? all? of them.)
I seem to remember that the Buells dont have a lot of weight to lose.
I say knock off 15 cu in. of the HD's. Napkin math says probably a bit over 2 hp per cube. There used to be 2 different displacements for 2 to 4 valve-preceded has been set.
I dont want them too far behind the 8 ball- I want 3 makes having an equal chance. Give them plenty of time to test + have a working combo by mid season.