So many of us complaining about our sport becoming cookie-cutter.
They come up with something just a little different, and we still complain.
Paul makes a good point, as one of those who has heavily criticized the approach of the management of the NHRA here, I'll agree its only fair to give them a pat on the back in this case. They are trying something new and different (well in the modern era at least) that appeared to have the potential to raise the interest level in drag racing.
Being a traditionalist I had concerns about it, but I kept an open mind and I was really hoping that it did bring a new level of excitement to the racing that could bring in some new fans.
Unfortunately my opinion is that it didn't succeed. For me the actual televised racing and the presentation of it using the brackets was way too confusing and hard to absorb or get excited about.
I can believe that live its pretty wild to see, but I don't think that alone can justify this type of racing, if it doesn't televise as well as 2 lane racing its going to hurt the sport.
As has been pointed out in previous posts, it also really weakened the impact of the big one on one matchups that really raise the interest and excitement level, the four boxers in the ring at once is a good analogy.
So my summary is that it didn't really bring any new fans to the sport and just managed to turn off a good portion (somewhere around 50% by my informal measure) of the existing fans.
As with most new approaches (and this applies both to racing and marketing), most of them don't work out and unfortunately I believe that's the case with this one, that's just the way it is.
But its getting a second shot and maybe they've worked out the issues that were causing problems, so I'll be open minded and hope they can turn it around and make it exciting this time.
But if it comes off so-so again, its time to be realistic and put it in the large pile of other things that didn't work out (right on top of the Pro Stock Trucks).