- Joined
- Jul 8, 2006
- Messages
- 4,989
- Age
- 47
- Location
- Oswego, IL
Not really, 2 adults having a conversation is it.Wow, so disrespectful.
Not really, 2 adults having a conversation is it.Wow, so disrespectful.
Link to the full article is right at the bottom of the original post. Takes about 5 minutes to read. There is a lot of truth to what he says, I think.haven't read the article but I always agree with Jon...…………...
There’s been a lot of pointing out things people don’t like about Jon’s article. But, it doesn’t appear there has been anything or anyone showing inaccuracies in what he wrote.
You keep saying that but you've still failed to address the main component - do you think that NHRA is on the same par as MLB and NASCAR? The answer is no so the remainder of your questions are irrelevant. You need to show why NHRA is in the same league as MLB and NASCAR because that is the basis of Asher's faulty argument.
You keep saying that but you've still failed to address the main component - do you think that NHRA is on the same par as MLB and NASCAR? The answer is no so the remainder of your questions are irrelevant. You need to show why NHRA is in the same league as MLB and NASCAR because that is the basis of Asher's faulty argument.
After rereading the thread and paying particular attention to Jon's post I have three questions. And I would really like an answer. I could call or text Jon just as he could me. But, this played in in this forum and I would like it to be posted here.
Jon,
1: What was the objective of the original story? To help? To hurt? Or just to throw a turd in the punch bowl?
2: Did you leave the situation better or worse then you found it?
3: You stated, these are YOUR WORDS. " My intent has ALWAYS been to try and improve drag racing." Did you do that here?
Alan
I find it interesting that you refused to answer Micheal Reed s questions ( that might make the NHRA mamagement look bad) but you want your questions about the Asher story answered.After rereading the thread and paying particular attention to Jon's post I have three questions. And I would really like an answer. I could call or text Jon just as he could me. But, this played in in this forum and I would like it to be posted here.
Jon,
1: What was the objective of the original story? To help? To hurt? Or just to throw a turd in the punch bowl?
2: Did you leave the situation better or worse then you found it?
3: You stated, these are YOUR WORDS. " My intent has ALWAYS been to try and improve drag racing." Did you do that here?
Alan
Okay, I’ll respond – again.
Please note that whatever appears here is likely to become moot after NHRA’s release of their altered schedule later this afternoon, something we’re all looking forward to.
Once again the Man-Who-Writes-in-Red asks a question with an obvious answer, which he chooses to ignore, but nevertheless:
What was the point of the editorial? To point out to every fan of NHRA Drag Racing that while every other form of motorsports had remained engaged and connected with the media, NHRA had failed to do so.
Despite what was written, I wasn’t throwing rocks at NHRA, but was merely pointing out a very important shortcoming.
I was asked if I’d made the situation better or worse for having pointed out this shortcoming. My editorial had no impact on that either way. Only NHRA itself can improve the situation – by trying to re-engage with the media and fans.
In responding to the question of whether or not my words had “improved” drag racing or not, see the sentence above. Only NHRA can “improve” things with a better media effort and presence.
As I’ve also previously stated both verbally and in writing, If I wrote something that was incorrect let me know and I’ll try to correct it, but if you just disagree with my opinion, that’s up to you. I didn’t write anything that was incorrect. NHRA has failed to maintain a media presence during the pandemic. NHRA has not been included in the daily virus updates from Sports Business Journal while most other racing organizations have been listed. Chevrolet is putting out regular releases about the virtual racing that’s being hosted by NASCAR and IndyCar. NHRA was not included in the call with others sports organizations and the President. NHRA has furloughed or let go most of the employees in the Media Department. When an organization is absent from the media by its silence it definitely does require more work to re-connect.
So, what was so bad about what I wrote? That I pointed out NHRA’s media failures?
In the world of some of the people posting here, pointing out the errors or mistakes made by the NHRA is pure blasphemy and will not be tolerated.
As I said in my last posting, is anyone here naïve enough to believe that if they write a letter to someone at NHRA, or even call on the phone, that they’re going to get a serious listen or response? One aim of a published editorial is to generate a reaction. In this case that means hoping that NHRA might actually re-start its media efforts.
Keeping silent about the issue wouldn’t have “convinced” NHRA to re-engage. The only thing that would have happened is, uh, nothing, and how does that benefit drag racing?
But those of us who write those editorial do so not to be negative and not to be attacking NHRA. We do it in the hopes that someone in Glendora will perhaps read those words and say to themselves, “Ya know, this guy is right. We do need to…”
Jon Asher
Yes , you answer only one of the 4 questions. That's ok Asher answered the other 3. The NHRA is just plainly a poorly run company. When most teams are trying there best to keep there people, the NHRA gets rid of it's media ppl ( if reports are true) at a time when they need them the most.Darrell,
He asked if what Jon had written was true or untrue. I said in the first line of my last post "I never said that Jon had the facts wrong, or that any of his information was incorrect." And I didn't fact check him. I was asking why he thought it was productive to write it. I don't see how it is helpful either long or short term.
Alan