vegasnitro
Nitro Member
The concept of buying vans, equipping them with thousands of dollars of wire and repair tools and equipment, then hiring someone...paying them a good wage with good benefits is why I paid THREE times as much for cable.
I can't see how they'll continue with their current model. I realize they're ramping up to sell more services (high speed internet and telephone) but it still won't go. In this market Charter makes you "bundle" their services to get their new stuff. This means you have to pay three times as much for TV service for the privelege to buy their overpriced internet and overpriced phone service. It's an old fashioned business model based on high labor costs.
The bundle in Vegas is $99 (Cox Communications). That gets you 75 channels of TV, digital phone with all features, and 3 Mbit/s internet service. You can add HD for $10 (box rental ... no charge for the actual channels).
Either Charter's prices are WAY out of line, or you got a smokin' deal on your DirecTV John ... either way you done good. My parents have DirecTV in their motorhome, 1 receiver, HBOs, and sports package on top of the basic programming and it is $65 per month. The upside is no matter where they take the RV, they always have TV. The downside is that is a fair piece more than they pay their cable company in their home in Kentucky for LESS services/boxes.
As I was saying before, the cost of programming is not controlled by the cable/satellite companies, it is controlled by the networks. HBO is $8.95 per month (or thereabouts) no matter who you subscibe to. Sometimes you can get special rates, but that is controlled by HBO promotions, not by your local cable or satellite provider. That is why both cable and satellite try to get you to bundle channels together, for instance in Vegas if you want SpeedTV, you have to get the sports tier on digital cable. So you will wind up with ESPNU, ESPN Classic, Golf Channel, various Fox Sports outlets and some other junk just so you can watch Speed for an increase in your bill of $10, they are amoritizing the cost of the channels knowing that you will likely not watch all of them. It is the same for DirecTV.
Cable's operating overhead is surprisingly low. Once the cable is in the ground, and they got you as a subscriber, the ROI is relatively quick especially if you bundle services, because the internet is all cheese (at Cox we owned our own backbone and servers, if you had to lease bandwidth/server space, there is still a healthy profit margin in internet).
This is a 6 of one/half a dozen of the other type of argument. Some people have had good experience with satellite, some with cable and they will spend their dollars accordingly. When I worked there, I found people generally hate utility type companies, so I learned quickly not to wear company shirts out into public or volunteer where I worked to strangers, cuz then the b!tch session would begin ....
Sorry for being WAY off topic ....