Wikipedia sleuth's tool reveals entry fiddling

[Hutch]

Wikipedia sleuth's tool reveals entry fiddling - Telegraph

 

[.]

Notice how many edits were made by the media and liberals to attack conservatives?

 

[.]

Notice how many edits were made by the media and liberals to attack conservatives?

Notice the 100+ edits made by Fox News?

Fox Noise. Fair, Balanced, and Revising History.

 

[.]

Notice the 100+ edits made by Fox News?

Fox Noise. Fair, Balanced, and Revising History.

Fox isn't the only media outlet doing editing. The difference between Fox and the others is that the lefty media outlets are doing name-calling on top of the editing. Shows how immature and biased some of those on the left really are.

 

[.]

Fox isn't the only media outlet doing editing. The difference between Fox and the others is that the lefty media outlets are doing name-calling on top of the editing. Shows how immature and biased some of those on the left really are.

CBS News - 0 Edits
ABC News - 0 Edits
NBC News - 0 Edits
CNN - 0 Edits
MSNBC - 0 Edits
FOX News - 102 Edits

Bias?

 

[.]

CBS News - 0 Edits
ABC News - 0 Edits
NBC News - 0 Edits
CNN - 0 Edits
MSNBC - 0 Edits
FOX News - 102 Edits

Bias?

An edit doesn't automatically mean it's biased, it could be a correction. It also doesn't mean that somebody from ABC, NBC,cBS, CNN didn't make edits with other IP's. If you had any common sense you'd know that. I like how you continue to dance around the fact that the NY Times and other left-biased media outlets made edits purely for name-calling. I don't see a single instance of that with any Fox edits. And we all know how libs love to make idiotic edits (we've plenty of proof of that) so maybe Fox was removing/editing those moronic lib edits. Keep spinning Greg, you libs are great at it!

 

[.]

An edit doesn't automatically mean it's biased, it could be a correction. It also doesn't mean that somebody from ABC, NBC,cBS, CNN didn't make edits with other IP's. If you had any common sense you'd know that. I like how you continue to dance around the fact that the NY Times and other left-biased media outlets made edits purely for name-calling. I don't see a single instance of that with any Fox edits. And we all know how libs love to make idiotic edits (we've plenty of proof of that) so maybe Fox was removing/editing those moronic lib edits. Keep spinning Greg, you libs are great at it!

You are right Brent. You, better than anyone, should know about how snooping IP addresses and then broadcasting them to other people works. You know, sorta like you did to users when you were a mod.

 

[.]

You are right Brent. You, better than anyone, should know about how snooping IP addresses and then broadcasting them to other people works. You know, sorta like you did to users when you were a mod.

I simply showed the forum you were hiding behind two usernames. I never sent anything to anybody. I know a lot of lefties love conspiracy theories but your assumption is completely ridiculous. Using two usernames to troll is called sockpuppetry and, guess what, libs love to do that quite often. Does the name Glen Greenwald ring a bell? He's a favorite blogger of the left and he got caught using a few different usernames on other blogs to stir up crap and argue with himself and others...kinda like you used to do.

If you had a clue about the software that runs this forum (and thousands of others) you'd know it's a very simple process to see who's using what IP's. You simply click a username and it'll show all the accounts that have used the same IP. I didn't have to work at it like you seem to think I did. Time to take off your tinfoil hat.

By the way, you're still dancing around the fact that left-biased media outlets simply made edits for no other reason than to do name-calling and throw out insults. Fox did not do that. Care to debate the topic or would you still like to dance around the subject by trying to switch topics...again?

 

[.]

I simply showed the forum you were hiding behind two usernames. I never sent anything to anybody. I know a lot of lefties love conspiracy theories but your assumption is completely ridiculous. Using two usernames to troll is called sockpuppetry and, guess what, libs love to do that quite often. Does the name Glen Greenwald ring a bell? He's a favorite blogger of the left and he got caught using a few different usernames on other blogs to stir up crap and argue with himself and others...kinda like you used to do.

If you had a clue about the software that runs this forum (and thousands of others) you'd know it's a very simple process to see who's using what IP's. You simply click a username and it'll show all the accounts that have used the same IP. I didn't have to work at it like you seem to think I did. Time to take off your tinfoil hat.

By the way, you're still dancing around the fact that left-biased media outlets simply made edits for no other reason than to do name-calling and throw out insults. Fox did not do that. Care to debate the topic or would you still like to dance around the subject by trying to switch topics...again?

I pointed out 102 edits. You want to blame it all on the "lefities", you go right ahead.

 

[.]

I pointed out 102 edits. You want to blame it all on the "lefities", you go right ahead.

Have you got your tap dancing shoes on because you sure are doing a great job of dancing around the facts. Like normal, I wouldn't expect anything else from you but to ignore the facts, twist words around and trying to steer the topic off course.

I pointed out that not a single Fox edit was done for idiotic reasons like name-calling, unlike the DNC, NY Times and other left-biased media did.