Isn't it the same for FC?Easy, let TF ignition timing retard to start at 2.8 seconds into the run instead of 2.5
It's happened before (late '70s, early '80s IIRC). The sport survived. Dogs didn't start sleeping with cats or anything cataclysmic like that.
TF headers were already laid back. Maybe some teams have experimented with it more but I have not noticed any recent significant changes (visually that is).Okay, I'm just an armchair crew chief, but I understand the concept of laid back headers. My question is, why don't we hear about that in TF? Is it the close proximity of the headers to the slicks? Just curious.
Nope, different ramp start times and RPM.Isn't it the same for FC?
I've checked the numbers from the Prudhomme/Beatle era, I don't know what your talking about.
Bailey?John, Paul, George or Ringo?
What happens? Dog and cats start sleeping together, the oceans start to boil. Ralph Nader buys a tricked out diesel dually and starts rolling coal, Florida will get 12 inches of snow, Iran and Israel will finally become friends, the US Government will balance the budget and the sun will being to rise in from the west.
When TF guys were running 5.60s, so was Prudhomme in his FC.I've checked the numbers from the Prudhomme/Beatle era, I don't know what your talking about. When Gary Beck was laying down the first 5.30 pass in '83? FC were still 5.60's!
nah... all of that would have already happened when Trump won, but........