Frank
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2006
- Messages
- 266
- Age
- 46
- Location
- Denver, CO
Yeah Eugene, I saw the interview they had with him, either on All Access or on the telecast I don't remember. It was good to see him again.
It has. Bob’s car lacks for nothing when it comes to the line, but any part-time car is at a disadvantage simply due to having less runs to draw data from.How do you guys think Bob Vandergriff's budget stacks up against the big dogs?
Has that been addressed?
Sorry. Carry on.
Alan, it's a balance of everything to get the result you are looking for. The chart below might help explain why a little bit better. Every inch of tire growth helps (a bunch) with speed at a given RPM. While any amount of wing counteracts that with drag and downforce (which compresses your tire diameter). Without giving away exactly what I do, last year in Las Vegas (2000ft), I added a little wing angle because the altitude is a bit higher and we still went 329MPH. This year in Joliet (600ft), I left that same amount in the wing because of the track prep changes and we only went 324. I'm sure there are other factors affecting that as well. The key is to realize that every change you make has consequences elsewhere and to try and get a handle on all of that. The only other thing I want to add to all that is there is one guy that really impresses me because he seems to understand ALL OF IT. That guy is David Grubnic!
View attachment 4676
The clutch is locked up at that point. The tires are absolutely slipping. All the way down the track. Go back to post #44
Alan
It's called bad math (on my part). When you type 5380 instead of 5280 for ft/mile, you get bad math.Mike, I built a spreadsheet using the same metrics that I could extrapolate down for my shorter tires. The one thing that didn't jibe was your final MPH figures. They are consistently slow by very close to 2%. Is there a tire or clutch slip factor in there? Or is that a tuner's secret and you'll have to kill me if you tell me?
What would you propose Cliff? I know guys (in years past) have looked at fluid drives, but they would have to be HUGE to deal with the power level and then there's the issue of heat.
At this point nothing else would be legal, but it might make an interesting discussion.
Alan
A Torquemaster.
I believe it was direct drive with a torque converter.Wasn't Prudhomme's T/F car called that? I think it was a transmission designed by B&M. So....wild thought. What if you could design a "torquemaster" with multiple gear changes, similiar to a clutch management system? Would something like that work? Yeah, I know, I've had c-c-coffee.