Nitromater

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!


Pomona Nitro fields - getting smaller! (15 Viewers)

Custom Body Fan

Nitro Member
I am looking forward to being in Pomona for 2 days of the Finals. The TF entry list was at 13, and is now down to 12! Meanwhile, there are 19 FCs entered. Too bad NHRA won't take the three slowest FCs and put them into the TF ladder to partly fill it up!! If it wasn't for Mercier making an unusually long haul, we'd be at 11 TF.

I am looking forward to returning to Pomona after a few years, but the super-short TF field isn't a good way to wrap up the year. Hopefully another couple entries decide to show up.
 
and today steve densham puts FC list @ 20.
i think the paton TF'r removed name from list? money/parts must not be right after vegas effort?
so far +2 for TF'rs next year, at least that will be committed to running the nhra schedule.
 
Last edited:
NHRA had better figure out how to correct this TF shortage problem before 8-car fields become the norm. Just a matter of time before the FC class starts to dwindle. These 2 nitro classes have to be made less expensive or they will disappear.
 
I am looking forward to being in Pomona for 2 days of the Finals. The TF entry list was at 13, and is now down to 12! Meanwhile, there are 19 FCs entered. Too bad NHRA won't take the three slowest FCs and put them into the TF ladder to partly fill it up!! If it wasn't for Mercier making an unusually long haul, we'd be at 11 TF.

I am looking forward to returning to Pomona after a few years, but the super-short TF field isn't a good way to wrap up the year. Hopefully another couple entries decide to show up.
I too have often thought that why not just allow unqualified FC's to be added to a short TF field (If the FC owner agrees). The FC vs TF match ups would be an interesting new twist and with the high number of up in smoke runs these runs would be competitive. At times if the TF field is short a lower budget car shows up,make one qualifying run,and they are in the field while a FC attempts 4 qualifying runs,doesn't make it,so they go home.
 
and today steve densham puts FC list @ 20.
i think the paton TF'r removed name from list? money/parts must not be right after vegas effort?
so far only +1 for TF'rs next year, at least that will be committed to running the nhra schedule.
Todd was going to run Galot also but is not.
 
I'd rather see TAD/TAFC be allowed to enter TF/FC races with short fields and receive the full pro payment for how they do, subjuct to TAD owner approval.

This includes allowing a double dip (same car allowed to compete in both TAD/TAFC and TF/FC at same event). In the event of a short field, first dibs go to highest points on the event entry list in TAD/TAFC. If the alky owner declines, the next guy(s) down the list gets the option.
 
NHRA brought this on themselves via the play off format, rules that strangled innovation, scheduling etc. Torrance is proving the point the format sucks, ran a limited schedule and will still finish in the top ten.
 
NHRA brought this on themselves via the play off format, rules that strangled innovation, scheduling etc. Torrance is proving the point the format sucks, ran a limited schedule and will still finish in the top ten.
Double edged sword regarding innovation Chuck. Innovation results in faster cars, which everyone agrees we don't need, at least in the fuel categories. And, innovation means more spending, which we also don't need. If innovation can lead to longer living components, which would save carnage and money in the long run, then that's a good thing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top