Did anyone stop to think maybe some of NHRA’s moves are purely for survival? The last few years I think certain moves in any business have been labeled greed when in fact in was a key to staying in business and keep folks employed. People always see the money comming in, but dont look at the cost it takes to keep the monster going. I am sure all of the other racing associations that have come and gone in the past 60 years wish they would have been a little more “greedy” in certain areas and still be around to showcase their product.
My major complaint with the NHRA is that is has become boring. This is the first time in over 30 years that I have not attended a national event. Sure the sights and sounds are still awesome, but it is way too predictable. OK, a Schumacher car is going to win TF, throw in a win for Lucas and AJ just for fun every now and then. FC, Force or Shoe. PS, a little excitement with the performance out of the other AJ, Cagnazzi and V Gains, but still the Summit Boys set the standard. PSM, we all know that story. At least all of the PS guys start out with the same head casting and do their magic from there.
Call me an old timer, but I really got into when a low buck part timer could mix it up. Racing always has been expensive, but when the needed investment in technology beats out hard work and mechanical smarts every time, it is a no win battle. So while I am a little put off with the current on track product, I have to side with the NHRA on some of these moves (except the HD deal, that is ridiculous!). You don’t last this long without making moves that might viewed as only money motivated, but guess what, money keeps this deal going. While I might not have attended a race this year, I never miss the TV shows, so thank you NHRA for being able to pickup the tab for ESPN2.
