New Pro Stock Bike Rules (1 Viewer)

I am stunned that they did this, but it may be too late to salvage PSM. The interest in this class has simply vanished.
I agree, it's not very entertaining when the same 2 guys win every race. And to top it off they have a proprietary engine & body (bike) style. that no one else can run. If Harley will not make the bottom end & heads available to anyone who has the $ to buy them,they should be disallowed. This is not the case in P/S car. Anybody can buy GM, Ford & Mopar blocks & heads build their own engines. The bodies are available to anyone who wants to buy one.
It's easy to see Harley bought the championships,With NHRA happy to take their $$.
 
Jon Asher right on the money!

http://www.competitionplus.com/drag-racing/editorials/22862-up-front-the-sellout-times-three

The National Hot Rod Association’s dealings with Harley-Davidson eclipse the term reprehensible by a wide margin. In exchange for the naming rights, i.e., the sponsorship, of the Sportsman Motorcycle Series, and an extension of their status as the Official Motorcycle, Harley-Davidson was granted unprecedented “rights” that absolutely, positively and without question resulted in much more than an unfair advantage for a single team. It resulted in a “racing” season that all but destroyed one of NHRA’s core professional categories, all for Harley-Davidson’s dollars. It’s safe to say that corporate greed on the part of NHRA has resulted in a loss of credibility from which they may never recover.

Why, after witnessing what NHRA knowingly allowed Harley-Davidson to do, would any other motorcycle manufacturer even consider getting involved with NHRA? That NHRA is either blind to that, or simply doesn’t care, is evident in their failure to respond, either verbally or in writing, to the letters they’ve received from aftermarket companies and manufacturers seeking involvement in the class and series.

In the 60-plus year history of the NHRA the organization has never allowed a potential sponsor to dictate the “rules” under which they’d participate. Uh, wait a minute. They did exactly that with their exclusivity of name gathering for the Army, and exactly that with their acceptance of Barry Grant’s carburetors for sponsoring the Challenge.

So, by allowing H-D to dictate that they only wanted Vance & Hines to run their exclusive parts NHRA wasn’t setting any precedent, because they’d already sold out at least twice previously that we know about. But one wonders how many more deals like that have been made that we don’t know about.

Almost as offensive as the H-D arrangement was the organized lying about parity in the motorcycle class that NHRA officials perpetrated on anyone foolish enough to question what was going on. Despite the obviousness of the disparity in the class that any moron with a set of eyes could see, NHRA continued to spread the lie that parity existed. That parity did not exist in the real world became evident with two articles that appeared within hours of one another on CompetitionPlus.com. The first (Competition Plus - Drag Racing Magazine - NHRA DEEMS PSM CLASS TO HAVE PARITY; CONSIDERING RULES CHANGES FOR 2013) quoted NHRA officials stating that parity existed. Five or six hours later NHRA announced a new motorcycle rules package for 2013 (Competition Plus - Drag Racing Magazine - NHRA ANNOUNCES 2013 ENGINE COMBINATION PACKAGE FOR HARLEY-DAVIDSON AND BUELL) that also included the telling addition of 10 lbs. to the dominant Harley-Davidsons of Vance & Hines. The only possible conclusion that can be drawn from this is that NHRA was well aware of the performance disparities between the Harleys and every other motorcycle, and added the 10 lbs. in the hopes of possibly silencing an ever-growing number of complaints.

Want more proof that NHRA knew the parity story was baloney? How about this quote from the September 19 release: “We have been working on a long-term solution for the Pro Stock Motorcycle class for the last several months.” So, during at least a three-month span NHRA repeatedly and aggressively tried to convince racers, sponsors, fans and the media that there was parity in the class when they knew that was not the case. In other words – and it’s difficult to explain this in any other manner – they were knowingly lying to everyone they tried to convince of the parity that didn’t exist. If that isn’t the truth, why were they still touting parity mere hours before the rules announcement?

The only explanation we can find for NHRA’s organized lying is their desire to protect their financial arrangement with Harley-Davidson at the expense of integrity. The money was more important than their reputation in the world of motorsports. People left with the impression that Harley-Davidson bought and paid for the Pro Stock Motorcycle class and championship have the correct impression, because that’s what’s happened.

In the almost 50 years I’ve been writing about NHRA Drag Racing I can’t remember another single instance where the organization allowed one team access to parts that weren’t readily available to other competitors. There are dozens, maybe hundreds of other Harley-Davidson racers out there, yet there have been none in NHRA competition. Why? Because none of those hopefuls had even a prayer of getting their hands on the exclusive parts that only V&H have access to. From the beginning those parts were only available to Vance & Hines, which was Harley-Davidson’s choice. Worse yet, an NHRA official has been quoted as saying that even if a competitor showed up with a bolt-by-bolt copy of a Vance & Hines Harley they’d never let it get past tech. Nice, level playing field there, eh?

What NHRA enabled H-D to do would be akin to Ford telling NHRA that in exchange for becoming the Official Car they didn’t want anyone but John Force running a Mustang in Funny Car, or anyone in Pro Stock other than Larry Morgan running a Ford. Oh! And both competitors must be allowed to run 600ci engines.

I want to make it clear that I have the utmost respect for both Terry Vance and Byron Hines. The same goes for Eddie Krawiec and Andrew Hines (although Krawiec’s suggestion earlier this year that if others worked as hard as his team does they might be winning instead of whining was ill-advised and backfired badly). Both are excellent riders and racers, and in Vance and Hines they have the best management team in motorcycle racing.

These guys can’t be faulted for what they’re doing, which is taking the tools handed to them by NHRA, “tools” that only they have, and winning with them. Throughout this entire sordid affair I have never heard a single racer or member of the media finding fault with the Screamin’ Eagle team. Every bit of animosity has been aimed directly at 2035 Financial Way in Glendora, Calif., because it’s been NHRA that has put this team in such a superior, virtually untouchable position.

Yes, it would appear that motorcycle racing in 2013 will be markedly different than it’s been since last fall, when the Harleys began their win streak. But despite those changes, the hundreds of racers and aftermarket people who have been negatively impacted by NHRA’s lying and obfuscation of the truth aren’t going to forget how they were treated, talked down to as if they were children, and pretty much ignored.
 
This was posted on another thread so I decided to leave it on here to.

I'm not really up on the cost of operating a Pro Stock motorcycle team but I imaging after traveling expenses and parts breakage if they don't win the wally they're losing money. It looks like the way to solve this problem is don't show up that way they just have one round to run with Krawiec and Hines. Make sense, why through away money when odds are that great against you.
 
Jon, that article that was right on the money and very well written.

I particularly enjoyed the contrast of today's management with the approach Wally Parks had used to run and grow the sport.

As you knew Mr. Parks, please continue to give us as many insights you can on how you think he would deal with the challenges the sport faces today, we need all the help we can get.
 
it is hard to admit, but have been paying more attention to PSB lately since HD left.
noticed on nhraracer.com last week the class has new 10lb less rule for v-twin bikes. wonder if that is enough to make difference in front runners?
or is the susuki formula pretty much where it's at now?
 
I apologize for hijacking this topic, but I still believe PSB would have more fan engagement and much more manufacturer support if the class ran "stock" 600's and no wheelie bar. If its on the bike, it better have an OEM part number. And ... the ECU was handed to the rider on the ready line.

There is nothing Suzuki on Steve J's "Suzuki", nothing Buell on Fly'n Ryan's Buell and there was nothing Harley on the VH Harleys. The emperor is butt ass naked. What we have is heads up competition eliminator missing two wheels.

The modern pro stock Suzuki is a great technological exercise, but I'd rather see Honda's, Yamaha's, Kawasaki's, Suzuki's and Triumph's battle with VERY skilled riders.
 
is there any factory support in PSB? suzuki? i have no idea. when i was a little kid, it was the kawasakis always dominating
the weekend bike classes.......i think you still find a lot of those old bikes still making laps around the country?
 
I think the Vance and Hines team has a "strategic partnership" with Suzuki.
 
I recently attended a parking lot car show and saw a Kawasaki 750 triple. I remember in my younger days I always wanted one.
Looking at it through the eyes of an older experienced rider, I'm thankful I never got one. I don't think I'd be typing this today.
It was obvious as to why it was called WIDOW MAKER. LOL I couldn't believe those small tires on it.
 
Ways To Support Nitromater

Users who are viewing this thread


Back
Top