hellfirejim
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2006
- Messages
- 334
- Age
- 78
John, this is not directed at you but more a hope that this will get back to the people producing the shows.
The most important point is to remember there are more people racing out there than the ones in the count down. Stop devoting close to 90% of your coverage to them. Yes I agree that they should extra coverage and I have no problem with it but really, Doug K had to win the whole thing before he even got a finish line interview.
I think it is a matter of priorities. What does YOUR audience want to see? Not what YOU think they want to see but what THEY want to see. First they want to see the winners of the races. These people have earned the right for their TV time. THEN if you have the time do the back round stories and other prominent people. I have no problem with these other stories and in their place can be interesting and intertaining but not at the exspense of the people who earned the right by winning their race. I am curious by what criteria do you judge who gets the top end interview? What guidelines are used where the looser is more important than the winnner not even getting mentioned????
Do I really think this will make a difference, maybe not but I feel alot better now.
Thanks
jim
The most important point is to remember there are more people racing out there than the ones in the count down. Stop devoting close to 90% of your coverage to them. Yes I agree that they should extra coverage and I have no problem with it but really, Doug K had to win the whole thing before he even got a finish line interview.
I think it is a matter of priorities. What does YOUR audience want to see? Not what YOU think they want to see but what THEY want to see. First they want to see the winners of the races. These people have earned the right for their TV time. THEN if you have the time do the back round stories and other prominent people. I have no problem with these other stories and in their place can be interesting and intertaining but not at the exspense of the people who earned the right by winning their race. I am curious by what criteria do you judge who gets the top end interview? What guidelines are used where the looser is more important than the winnner not even getting mentioned????
Do I really think this will make a difference, maybe not but I feel alot better now.
Thanks
jim
Last edited: