thanks josh, i thought they were the same. so marshall's -1.798 under for #1 Q, really reads like -1.498 with nhra indexes?
still factoring that, the top 3 cars laid down big numbers.
thanks josh, i thought they were the same. so marshall's -1.798 under for #1 Q, really reads like -1.498 with nhra indexes?
still factoring that, the top 3 cars laid down big numbers.
i don't understand where there is any advantage to having slower indexes than the nhra.
why not just leave the same? seems like an easy solution so everyone can run both series as easily as possible with matching numbers.
does ihra implement any sort of teardown beyond their tech procedure?
two cars ran darn near -1.50 under their nhra indexes.
i don't understand where there is any advantage to having slower indexes than the nhra.
why not just leave the same? seems like an easy solution so everyone can run both series as easily as possible with matching numbers.
does ihra implement any sort of teardown beyond their tech procedure?
two cars ran darn near -1.50 under their nhra indexes.
I’m not sure why, but IHRA has always been .3 slower. It’s just a numbers thing, in the end.
This is considered mineshaft conditions, so even at NHRA AHFS would not be in effect. Mineshaft is determined when half plus one of the field is .80 (NHRA) under or more. In our case, 1.10 under. 21 of 35 stockers went more than 1.10 under, and 18 of 34 Super Stock.
thanks for the explanation josh. those really were some numbers put up today.
great veteran talent on the mic today as well. ME and AR doing what they do best. thanks guys.
Yikes, where are the fans? I think there's more people standing on the starting line than what is in the stands. On a side note, they just said that Jasmine is sick and won't be driving. I think they said Jon Capps is driving.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.