Jay
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2006
- Messages
- 312
- Age
- 51
- Location
- Miami, Florida
Please point out in any of my posts were I personally attacked you.
As for the rest of your points, we could argue all day so I'll just drop it.
I would not do any work for racer if I thought it would be detriment to the sport. I think making NHRA into a NASCAR clone would be a HUGE detriment.
The teams I mostly have worked with were what could be considered underdogs, teams that are not be able to get funding like JFR and DSR and would most likely have to leave racing if costs escalated any more than they are now.
Do you agree that raising fundings for the big dogs will kill the smaller teams, and, that the big dogs WOULD be the biggest recipient of increased funding?
"Jay, my mistake, I thought you were in the marketing business." - Paul, this was B.S and you know it...
Anyway, moving on....you say that you aren't even going to respond to the other points I made in my last post because we could argue all day...interesting...What I said about the situation in Charlotte was right on...could it be that I was right and you just don't like that? I don't see what there would be to argue about the facts?
About the exapmple using your business...again...not going to respond...? Interesting...What I said made a lot of sense...for some reason you don't agree..I'd like to know why?
As far as the team funding goes? In the current state where a team can have 4 cars in a class, while I feel that it would certainly be much better than it is right now, I do agree with you that 60% or more of the benefit would go to the more established teams, but that certainly isn't to say that the small teams would suffer. I think that you would find that the smaller teams would see a tremendous benefit to seeing the sport grow in leaps and bounds, as well...That being said, in NASCAR you are seeing that now...Yates is still looking for a sponsor for his 2 cars, and Roush is helping them do that because Roush can't have more than 4 cars. THat is a situation that is very interesting because it is the first time that I have seen teams work THAT closely together...You will see more of that in the next year or two, as well with Hendrick, RCR, Gibbs, etc...These teams are really starting to increase their alliances besides just engine leases and chassis now...
Now, in NASCAR, they can have 4 teams per owner...In NHRA it is exactly the same, but it shouln't be...We only have 16 starting spots in each class on Sunday while NASCAR has 43. Each owner should only be allowed to have 2 teams in each class...This will allow for each team to be able to compete on a much bigger and more even playing field....They will maximize the funding for those 2 cars in the class...Now you may have 10-12 super teams potentially with 6 cars and two bikes if they are in every class...I think that would be a really nice balance because now you would also have 6-8 single car teams showing up to make the show too...It would be awsome!
If that was the case, you now have 10-12 marketing teams pushing the sport with their sponsors, retial promotions, souvenir licensing like PJ talked about, and you have full fields that are well funded, and so on...It can only get better from there...
Last edited: