I am not a 4 wide hater. I go to 8-10 National events each year and did attend the first 4 wide event.
I am glad I did attend 4 wide once to see what it would be like. I thought it was OK but, like many others have indicated, too much is going on at once and it's too hard to keep track of which car is which as they go down the track. I found the TV show yesterday just as difficult. The blimp shot was helpful but since you couldn't see the detail on the cars I found myself picking the two cars I thought would run the best and focusing on them while ignoring the other two cars. Even then I didn't know who the two winners were until Paul/Mike announced. Other than really close races, I should be able to visually determine the winner as they cross the finish line from the camera view, as is usually the case with the TV broadcasts.
To me, the 4 wide is a gimmick race. I have no desire to attend it again. However, I live in California so that is an easy decision to reach. I suppose if I lived on the East coast I might attend.
I found it interesting that Paul Page indicated that the fans love it. At the races I attend the subject comes up in discussions with people sitting around me and I have yet to find someone who has attended that really liked it. I'm sure some people do but it would be interesting to poll people who attend both Zmax events which one they like better.
As to Alan's comment on attendance, I thought there were a lot of empty seats too on the broadcast. Alan may be right on capacity. It would be interesting to compare attendance at 4 wide vs other east coast events except NHRA doesn't release that information.