Nitromater

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!


Who will be first ?

1320Classifieds.net

Post your FREE classified ads today.
No Fees, No Hassle, just simple and effective Ads.


If the hotties of the NHRA wanted to pose for a lad's magazine like Maxim (not Maxyum), then let them. Playboy is another story though, I don't consider it porn but a nude set would not be the best idea....

That said....

I take issue with the people that say "those magazines are degrading to women." The women that pose for those magazines are posing for those pictures out of their own free will (and many cases $$$$), nobody is putting a gun to their head and saying "You must pose for us!"

Also, I never once saw or heard a woman that can universally be considered attractive complain that the lad's mags are "degrading." It's almost always women that can be universally be considered unattractive and the man-haters at NOW that do the complaining. You can chalk that up to being bitter and jealous.

Excuse my cattiness, but then Sam, I guess we won't be seeing you posing anytime soon :p

AND I put Maxim, Stuff and FHM to be barely below the Playboy/Penthouse magazines.
 
okay, I'm weighing in on this one...

There is nothing wrong with the unclad human body. Having said that, I wouldn't want to see most people naked, nude, or unclad... most people I know look much better with clothes on....

This is just not something the world at large needs see, there is no Up Side at all.

And this whole thought tastes too much of seeing my own kids undressed, in a magazine...



d'kid
thinking in dad mode again...
 
If the hotties of the NHRA wanted to pose for a lad's magazine like Maxim (not Maxyum), then let them. Playboy is another story though, I don't consider it porn but a nude set would not be the best idea....

That said....

I take issue with the people that say "those magazines are degrading to women." The women that pose for those magazines are posing for those pictures out of their own free will (and many cases $$$$), nobody is putting a gun to their head and saying "You must pose for us!"
Wow, one of the few times that I've agreed with Sam. They're not being forced to pose for anything, if they don't want to they don't have to.

Also, I never once saw or heard a woman that can universally be considered attractive complain that the lad's mags are "degrading." It's almost always women that can be universally be considered unattractive and the man-haters at NOW that do the complaining. You can chalk that up to being bitter and jealous.
That can be summed up with one pic:
news154760415uv8.jpg
 
It's all a question of morals and the authority I answer to seems to put a great deal of weight on them so I will.
 
I think Sam should keep his thoughts on women over at the youtube site.
 
Ways To Support Nitromater

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top