When you do the same event 20+ times a season, it is a bit difficult to make each one too incredibly different sounding. In the NFL, NBA, MLB and such there are only so many different questions that can be asked or scenarios that come up game after game or race after race. I think the current crew does a good job. Production wise they seemed to have done better balancing the JFR love (scooter cam anyone). Other than the long down time during the live shows, I think they do fine.
Many, not all but many, of the drivers are on auto repeat in their interviews to cram as many sponsors in that it makes their interviews boring. Others like Beckman, Capps and Brown, are able to balance the plugs with heart, genuineness, insightful and entertaining interviews. That's not on the production crew, that is the on drivers to present themselves as more than robots.
I'm with you on the scooter cam, the helmet cam, the atv cam, the starter cam etc....but that is the director and producers...
Sure, the drivers sound like broken records....
....but then it's the job of the director and producer to fashion a line of questioning that limits their ability to get stuck in that rut. Steer it back to the cars, their performance, how and what they changed, and the actual things done during the race should be the topics, but they usually get asked how it feels to be them, how it feels how it feels how it feels....Even the racers (drivers and crew) cringe at these well worn angles. They find it refreshing to be able to talk about the nuts and bolts of going quick versus the "how do you pee on the way to the moon?" type questions. This is completely on the director/producer to steer the program in the direction of showing more racing, and talking more racing....but they don't. THEY LOVE THE DRAMA and not so much the actual reason people want to watch a race. RACING!!
Sure it's tough to differentiate one race from another. The only way, and also the EASIEST way is to concentrate on the track, the cars, and the performance. Who's on top? Who has a handle on the track? What do tuners do to negotiate each lane at this track? Concentrate on this, and it becomes easy to even layman that each track is a different challenge, and just how slippery that cherry pit called a nitro tune actually is. One day you're a hero, next day, you fail to qualify. There's loads of actual, real life drama within these few things mentioned that no TV crew would have to manufacture any other drama, but apparently, it's not the "right" kind of drama. This is racing drama, and what they want is Hollywood Soap Opera drama. Two very different types of drama, and two very different audiences.
The other best thing has been mentioned on these boards....trim the number of races down. Make the National Event something special again, not what happens on almost every Sunday from Feb-Oct.
As far as I know, here's the current producers and director. It's totally on them to create a show that showcases racing, and not
twitter/facebook-centric dramathons.
http://espnmediazone.com/us/bios/feinberg_rich/
http://espnmediazone.com/us/bios/jackson_kate/
http://espnmediazone.com/us/bios/bruce-watson/
with the exception of Dunn and Bruno, ex racers make awful broadcasters. anybody remember when Cruz took a shot at it.
That's true in most any sport. No one ever said it was easy, or took no talent. It takes gobs of talent.
Greg Anderson was pretty good in the booth...
I still think NBC nailed it. F1 has four people. An ex crew guy, an ex driver, a knowledgeable pit reporter, and a knowledgeable
color commentator who sews all the above into a good discussion and play by play....not to mention a real passion for the racing going on from all mentioned above.