Somebody said, "not everyone has deep enough pockets to run a balls-out class."
I can certianly understand that position. That has been used as a rationale to build a "bracket" car (like my very own Mopar) for years....
However, when I look at what Super Comp, for instance, has become, (in terms of technology,) I wonder...
The "norm" in that Eliminator, has sifted down to this:
Really big-inch, expensive stroker motors with mega-dollar heads, and intake systems that look like thousands and thousands of dollars, unbreakable "Powerglides" (if you can call them that) containing not one single OEM part, or the Bruno setup with a Lenco/convertor combination, hooked to a totally aftermarket, 9-inch Ford "clone" hi-strength, rear end, attached to a professionally-built chassis that may or may not feature rear suspension, along with $$$$$$ electronics. It all makes me wonder if it wouldn't actually be cheaper to build a Competition Eliminator car, where you can actually OUTRUN somebody.
I don't know the answer to that, but I'd bet that the price differential wouldn't be a lot.
So, given the above situation, the argument that people running S/C are doing it because they can't afford to race a "performance" class is suspect, to me.
I think it started out that way, but with the advent of outrageous speeds in these .90 Eliminators, (and, the necessary horsepower and all that goes with containing it) I have to think that that rationale went right out the window.
The guy who first said, "Speed costs money; how fast do you want to go?" wasn't kidding...