rpasley
Nitro Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2007
- Messages
- 38
- Age
- 66
While I sympathize with the dilemma that BB is in, he's simply wrong about his assessment of the numbers and projections of the numbers. While the numbers look comparatively good in Ohio, that's 90 percent to the credit of Dewine and Acton, who were among the very first to see the nature of this disaster and respond to it appropriately, 5 percent to the fact that Ohio has the highest number of hospital beds per capita in the USA, and 5 percent to the fact that Ohio is primarily a rural state with significant pre-existing social distancing. Just look a hundred miles away to see the utter devastation in Michigan, which has a horrifying infection rate and death toll. But much more importantly, this disaster is not some local or regional catastrophe in which his small universe perspective, as painful and real I'm sure it is, has any relevance whatsoever. It's clearly a "natural" catastrophe (please spare us from your conspiracy theories) of global proportions, and the only way to gain any control of this is to increase, not decrease, the mitigation-thru-isolation strategies the governments around the world are employing. What BB and everyone else in the US needs to demand is testing, testing, and more testing...only then will we understand the ACTUAL infection rate and the ultimate morbidity rate, and the sooner we'll know when the overall risk drops to a range of being manageable. We are no where close to having any idea of that.
Just a quick question for those who live in a community that would be considered suburban or urban. Have you gotten a haircut in the last 4 weeks? Will you get a haircut if you do NOT definitively know that your favorite barber is NOT a carrier of the virus (either by virtue s/he having developed antibodies to it by already having been infected, or by having been tested, or because the infection rate has dropped to an 'acceptable' level)? I know I won't, and I need a haircut desperately. That's an example of why testing, testing, testing is so critical...
Just a quick question for those who live in a community that would be considered suburban or urban. Have you gotten a haircut in the last 4 weeks? Will you get a haircut if you do NOT definitively know that your favorite barber is NOT a carrier of the virus (either by virtue s/he having developed antibodies to it by already having been infected, or by having been tested, or because the infection rate has dropped to an 'acceptable' level)? I know I won't, and I need a haircut desperately. That's an example of why testing, testing, testing is so critical...