Valid points on all sides. Here is my rationale for wanting to allow a-fuel TAFC (this coming from someone who usually cheers for the blown car in TAD when the two fuel types race against each other):
At some point, if car counts dwindle, then there is no point in having the class any more. It we're going to average 10-12 cars per event in 2022, then imho that's about at the line where the class could be cut.
By allowing another fuel option, that should help the numbers pick up to where there can at least be full fields again. I asked earlier why there are more a-fuel TAD than blown cars, but nobody answered. I don't want the blown tafc to go away, but if the rule change is made, allow at least 2-3 years then judge how it's going. Nobody is mandated to change fuels, but if some racers want to, or if an a-fuel TAD driver wants to try it in TAFC, why not?
Put another way, even if numbers don't change, NHRA has not lost anything (ie - they would be at the same point). I believe after a couple seasons, the #s would rebound to between 16-20 cars on average, or in other words, be similar to the TAD numbers (BTW, this would also have a positive effect on TAFC entries at Divisional races).