Its about FRIGGIN TIME!!
If it wasn't for his sisters persistence Goodwin may have never gone to trial.
The guy should swing like Saddam, but after all of appeals are done, they should offer to remove the "without possibility of parole" if he rats out the gunmen.
Jay
How in the World does a Trashbag like this guy get what 20+ year's of appeals?? Our legal system's corrupt as it gets!
The guy should swing like Saddam, but after all of appeals are done, they should offer to remove the "without possibility of parole" if he rats out the gunmen.
Jay
How in the World does a Trashbag like this guy get what 20+ year's of appeals?? Our legal system's corrupt as it gets!
Sorry Joe, our legal system is not corrupt. It works today exactly as the founding fathers intended it to work.
It is the prosecutor's job to prove a case 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. People called the system faulty after the O.J. verdict, with all kinds of calls for 'reform' of the legal system. Did anything change? No, not one thing. After the hysteria died down, most thinking people understood that the prosecution failed to prove it's case 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. And a high school kid could see that if they tuned in to even a small part of the televised procedings.
Benjamin Franklin believed “For the law holds, that it is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.”
The Thompson issue is on the other side of the spectrum from O.J.'s Apparently the prosecution did it's job, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt and the circumstantial evidence was enough to convict.
I'm sure most all of us have abused the phrase "I'm going to kill...." either jokingly or as a way to say how badly we're going to beat someone in a sport. Apparently the jury could see the difference between that and saying "I'm going to kill Mickey Thompson and I can get it done for $50,000."
I still say that promising to do it should be just as much of a confession as admitting it after the fact. We won't hesitate to convict someone on a confession alone even if there's no other evidence. Why only believe them if they say it AFTER it's done?