yup and if memory serves, those wins were all 'gifts'
You're probably right, but then she has eight round wins against the Harleys as well. Were those all "gifts" too?
You line up and race, sometimes you win on performance, sometimes on reaction time, sometimes it's just right place right time. But to dismiss someone's effort just because she's racing a teammate (or in this case husband) isn't fair the the competitor who is putting in the effort.
Can you imagine what the talk would be today if Billy Torrence had smoked the tires yesterday against Steve? But when Antron does it against Brittany it's just hard racing.
Alan
I wish I could find the video of when Gary Beck broke and Larry Minor had to jump on the brakes so hard that he had the car bouncing. I would like to see NHRA remove the diving rule from the rule book. Dive or no dive...congratulations to Matt Smith for a hard fought and well deserved championship.
I hear some say that because Matt's bike was so dominate on Sunday, she wouldn't have won anyway.
I didn't see the race so I don't know what went down but there is a big difference between being a chicken and using smart business sense. I wonder how many of the fans that are against it would change their mind if they were in the position to make that decision. I wouldn't expect anyone to admit they would do it though. Now, if you have an unlimited cash flow and you don't care about the championship then maybe you would admit to it.Does it matter that the rule is even there? A. Smith's dive was so obvious that I do not understand how anyone can defend that (Alan). There have been other dives that have been just as obvious; maybe harder to prove. Yet, not once has the rule ever been enforced. Is there even a protocol in place as a diciplenary action? Probably not. So, why remove it? It's obviously a ceremonial rule meant to give us a warm and fuzzy feeling, but still completely meaningless. I hear some say that because Matt's bike was so dominate on Sunday, she wouldn't have won anyway. Well... run it then. Don't be a chicken $h_t.
My $ .02
Dive or no dive...congratulations to Matt Smith for a hard fought and well deserved championship.
Does it matter that the rule is even there? A. Smith's dive was so obvious that I do not understand how anyone can defend that (Alan). There have been other dives that have been just as obvious; maybe harder to prove. Yet, not once has the rule ever been enforced. Is there even a protocol in place as a diciplenary action? Probably not. So, why remove it? It's obviously a ceremonial rule meant to give us a warm and fuzzy feeling, but still completely meaningless. I hear some say that because Matt's bike was so dominate on Sunday, she wouldn't have won anyway. Well... run it then. Don't be a chicken $h_t.
My $ .02
i wonder if ed krawieck was fine with it, ..... on the other hand its very hard to have any sympathy for the harley team, given their favorable rules status and the fact that they have been guilty of team shenanigans in the past also............ They did what they set out to do, and I'm fine with it.
Alan
Does it matter that the rule is even there? A. Smith's dive was so obvious that I do not understand how anyone can defend that (Alan). There have been other dives that have been just as obvious; maybe harder to prove. Yet, not once has the rule ever been enforced. Is there even a protocol in place as a diciplenary action? Probably not. So, why remove it? It's obviously a ceremonial rule meant to give us a warm and fuzzy feeling, but still completely meaningless. I hear some say that because Matt's bike was so dominate on Sunday, she wouldn't have won anyway. Well... run it then. Don't be a chicken $h_t.
My $ .02
i wonder if ed krawieck was fine with it, ..... on the other hand its very hard to have any sympathy for the harley team, given their favorable rules status and the fact that they have been guilty of team shenanigans in the past also.