C'mon Jackee, you as well as everyone else knows it's one or the other.
Now if you know something the rest of us do not..please feel free to share.![]()
My company probably gets 15 or 20 jobs a month where a disgruntled employee decided to delete company records, and then we go in and recover the information. It sucks for the people involved, but it is pretty common in this day.
If you don't know if it's 'one or the other', it is speculation. Period.
When Herbert and/or Dupuy want the specifics known, I'm sure they'll speak out on the issue.
With the way laws are written, any combination that was developed by Wayne while he was employed with Herbert is intellectual property of Herbert. Herbert is entitled to those log books and any other information that was created during Wayne's tenure since he was en employee of Herbert.
That is only true if there was an agreement between Dupuy and Herbert giving Herbert ownership of the intellectual property as a condition of employment. Without such an agreement, intellectual property remains the property of the creator.
Jim
sounds like Wayne has done this before and Doug has gone about solving it the right way!!Ah People, Read Doug's comment to Ashler at CompPlus... he wants his Parts back....
Jim,
My understanding is just the opposite. That is, unless there is an an agreement otherwise, then, (inventions, sales leads, intellectual property,) developed during employment remain property of the employer. That is the default position.
Well I guess you can say one thing. If W.D. took some tune up info over to the UPS team is sure didn't help mcuh.
When Brissette came into it, the whole car was still setup with a combination of W.D.'s parts, he probably got a baseline from another team that runs a similar combination of parts. From there he could get the ball rolling.I thought it was kind of strange also that Brisette would need a baseline, I suppose they just needed something with the same weather conditions to get started instaed of wasting good parts!!