I don't agree with his statement that 282 mph is blase. Not one bit.
I think he might actually be right to a certain degree, Bob. Kinda' gets back to what has been getting re-hashed around here about car/driver identities and such. NHRA has put such a premium on the marketing of the performance instead of the cars and drivers that it's what people automatically look for when attending an event. Not everyone, obviously, but there is a portion of it, I can guarantee you. I talk to casual fans on a daily basis and they almost never talk about the drivers themselves. It's always about how quick or fast someone went. What's even funnier yet is to hear some of them talk when they're racing out west during the middle of the summer (like right now). They almost have a critical tone to their voice when talking about how slow the cars run. They have no comprehension of what the heat does to hamper the performance of the cars through the engines and track temperatures, but because they've had the performance of NHRA drag racing pounded in their heads for so long, they don't know the difference.
I love Joe and have a lot of respect and admiration for this self-made man. But I wish he would not have said that NHRA is "proactive." That is a joke. I think he meant reactive.
This is beating another dead horse, but whether anyone likes it or not, you can only be so proactive. The NHRA has formed this board to do what they can to be as proactive as possible, and you know what? It's going to happen again, and you can take that to the bank. Furthermore, a percentage of the people that are praising the sanctioning body right now for forming this board,
and rightfully so, will also form the bandwagon of scrutiny when something else bad happens, because in their expert opinions, it would've been the result of something the board should've been able to see, but didn't.
Papa Joe said it best when he talked about losing sight of the important stuff for the sake of the thrill of speed and winning. Every single one of the drivers, including all of us on the lower levels, are not only guilty of it, but we'll
always be guilty of it. That was proven out on Sunday at Englishtown, when in light of the tragedy the day before, everyone suited up and ran the race on 1320' with the same amount of shut-down as the day before. And before anyone jumps on here and whines about the fact that they
had to because of sponsor obligations or whatever, I don't want to hear it, because that's bull$hit. If there was ever a perfect time for a boycott, that was it. But they didn't, and it was because,
in part, to exactly what Joe talks about in this article.
The bottom line is, these tragedies bring out the deepest of emotions in all of us, and when those emotions find their way out, we can tend to be a little overzealous when we talk about what we need to do or are going to do in some sort of protest. But at the end of the day, when the emotions have a little time to settle and we regain some of the perspective that these emotions can sometimes blur, we react in the best way we can, very much like the forming of NHRA's new safety board, and do what we can to prevent a repeat performance. That's all we can do, and all we'll ever be able to do.
Happy racing, folks.........
Sean D